From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Locke Subject: PowerOP on lkml or linux-pm? Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:32:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20060913045405.BA7DD1A0084@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <20060914091211.GA14874@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060914091211.GA14874@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek , Greg KH Cc: pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Pavel, Greg, I started CC'ing lkml as you guys requested (well forced really). Now = we have half the discussion occurring on linux-pm and the other half on = both. The guys on lkml are going to be lost and even more confused = than the people on this list. If you guys want lkml to see the = discussion, make sure you add them to the CC when replying to linux-pm = only emails. Perhaps we should keep the discussion on linux-pm until we are all = straight and then send the results to lkml. I'm open to whatever you = want as along as we are consistent. Matt