From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@kernel.org>,
"Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] power: supply: sysfs: register battery properties
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:57:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e64f38b4-8c7d-4680-ac17-a364cc843f48@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904-power-supply-extensions-v3-4-62efeb93f8ec@weissschuh.net>
Hi,
On 9/4/24 9:25 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Instead of only registering properties from the psy_desc itself,
> also register the ones from the battery.
> Use power_supply_has_property() for this test which makes the logic also
> easier to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/power_supply_sysfs.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_sysfs.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_sysfs.c
> index 3e63d165b2f7..4ab08386bcb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_sysfs.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static umode_t power_supply_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> struct power_supply *psy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> umode_t mode = S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH;
> - int i;
>
> if (!power_supply_attrs[attrno].prop_name)
> return 0;
> @@ -375,19 +374,11 @@ static umode_t power_supply_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> if (attrno == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TYPE)
> return mode;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < psy->desc->num_properties; i++) {
> - int property = psy->desc->properties[i];
> -
> - if (property == attrno) {
> - if (power_supply_property_is_writeable(psy, property) > 0)
> - mode |= S_IWUSR;
> -
> - return mode;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (power_supply_battery_info_has_prop(psy->battery_info, attrno))
> + if (power_supply_has_property(psy, attrno)) {
> + if (power_supply_property_is_writeable(psy, attrno) > 0)
> + mode |= S_IWUSR;
> return mode;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 19:25 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] power: supply: extension API Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] power: supply: core: rename psy_has_property() to psy_desc_has_property() Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:56 ` Hans de Goede
2024-09-14 9:30 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] power: supply: core: register thermal zone for battery Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:56 ` Hans de Goede
2024-09-14 9:29 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-14 9:55 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] power: supply: hwmon: register battery properties Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:57 ` Hans de Goede
2024-09-14 9:35 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] power: supply: sysfs: " Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:57 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-09-14 9:43 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] power: supply: sysfs: rework uevent property loop Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:58 ` Hans de Goede
2024-09-14 9:59 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] power: supply: core: implement extension API Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-14 10:50 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-14 14:25 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-16 10:58 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] power: supply: core: add locking around extension access Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] power: supply: test-power: implement a power supply extension Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-04 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] power: supply: cros_charge-control: use power_supply extensions Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e64f38b4-8c7d-4680-ac17-a364cc843f48@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox