From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 13/35] cpufreq: elanfreq: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:18:15 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c index 823a400..4000c34 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c @@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ static int elanfreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0); unsigned int i; - int result; /* capability check */ if ((c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD) || @@ -223,12 +222,7 @@ static int elanfreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; policy->cur = elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(0); - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, elanfreq_table); - if (result) - return result; - - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(elanfreq_table, policy->cpu); - return 0; + return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, elanfreq_table); } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e