Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Aiden Hecker <heckeraiden@gmail.com>,
	Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Detect Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid topology via CPUID 0x80000026 and program cpu_scale
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 00:02:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecc3eeb4-30d7-4d0c-b899-ab281c240964@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113012639.464343-2-heckeraiden@gmail.com>



On 11/12/26 19:26, Aiden Hecker wrote:
> On AMD Family 1Ah Model 60h (Ryzen AI 7 350 "Krackan Point"), physical cores
> alternate inside a single shared 16 MiB L3 CCX:
>    - Even cores (0, 2, 4, 6; SMT 8, 10, 12, 14) are Classic Zen 5 (5.09 GHz,
>      CPUID 0x80000026 CoreType=0, ACPI CPPC highest_perf 208/202/196).
>    - Odd cores (1, 3, 5, 7; SMT 9, 11, 13, 15) are Dense Zen 5c (3.51 GHz,
>      CPUID 0x80000026 CoreType=1, ACPI CPPC highest_perf 135).
> 
> Currently, `amd_detect_prefcore()` only inspects `MSR_AMD_CPPC_CAP1` during
> early boot. When firmware initializes the raw MSR with uniform values prior
> to ACPI `_CPC` evaluation, `amd_detect_prefcore()` disables `prefcore` and
> leaves `per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu)` at 1024 across all 16 threads. As a result,
> `select_idle_sibling()` treats 3.51 GHz Zen 5c cores as equal to 5.09 GHz
> Zen 5 Golden cores inside the shared L3 domain.
> 
> Fix this by:
> 1. Checking `CPUID 0x80000026` (`EAX[30]` Heterogeneous Core Topology and
>     `EBX[31:28]` CoreType) as a hardware fallback in `amd_detect_prefcore()`.
> 2. Programming per-CPU `cpu_scale` (`arch_set_cpu_capacity`) and ITMT core
>     priorities from the true CPPC / CoreType asymmetry so Zen 5 primary
>     (1024..965) and Zen 5 SMT (840..788) are ranked strictly above Zen 5c
>     dense cores (664 primary, 512 SMT).

On a Kracken system why are you even using amd-pstate for rankings?

They should be coming from amd-hfi.  Did you not enable that on your kernel?

> 
> Assisted-by: Antigravity (Google DeepMind)
> Tested-by: Aiden Hecker <heckeraiden@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aiden Hecker <heckeraiden@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 4a2d81e9012b..b87c4f319e04 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>   #include <linux/static_call.h>
>   #include <linux/amd-pstate.h>
> +#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>   #include <asm/msr.h>
>   #include <asm/processor.h>
>   #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> @@ -812,6 +814,67 @@ static void amd_pst_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
>   	cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Program asymmetric scheduler capacity (`cpu_scale`) and x86 ITMT priorities
> + * for hybrid Zen 5 (CoreType=0) + Zen 5c (CoreType=1) processors sharing an LLC.
> + *
> + * Even physical cores (Zen 5, 5.09 GHz) and their SMT siblings are ranked
> + * strictly above odd physical cores (Zen 5c, 3.51 GHz) so high-entropy
> + * interactive and real-time tasks never spill onto Zen 5c cores unless
> + * explicitly affinitized.
> + */
> +static void amd_pstate_update_hetero_capacity(int cpu, u32 highest_perf)
> +{
> +	u32 eax = 0, ebx = 0, ecx = 0, edx = 0;
> +	u32 core_type = 0;
> +	bool hetero = false;
> +	unsigned long cap = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +	int itmt_prio = (int)highest_perf;
> +	bool is_smt_secondary = (cpu >= 8);
> +
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000026) {
> +		cpuid_count(0x80000026, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> +		hetero = !!(eax & BIT(30));
> +		core_type = (ebx >> 28) & 0xF;
> +	}

FWIW, we already have feature flags for detecting a hetero system:

X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES

We also have topo information:

TOPO_CPU_TYPE_PERFORMANCE
TOPO_CPU_TYPE_EFFICIENCY
TOPO_CPU_TYPE_LOW_POWER

You're re-inventing quite a bit.

> +
> +	if (!hetero && highest_perf >= 196)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (core_type == 0) {
> +		/* High-Entropy Classic Zen 5 Core (CPPC 196..208) */

Your intending this to be Zen5, but you're actually applying this to any 
hetero design perf core AFAICT.

> +		if (!is_smt_secondary) {
> +			cap = clamp_t(unsigned long,
> +				      (highest_perf * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) / 208U,
> +				      960UL, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
> +			itmt_prio = (int)highest_perf;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Rank Zen 5 SMT siblings (cap 788..840, prio 160..172)
> +			 * ABOVE Zen 5c primary cores (cap 664, prio 135) because
> +			 * Zen 5 SMT executes branch-heavy flows +44% faster than Zen 5c.
> +			 */
> +			cap = clamp_t(unsigned long,
> +				      (highest_perf * 840UL) / 208U,
> +				      780UL, 840UL);
> +			itmt_prio = 160 + ((int)(highest_perf - 196U));
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* Low-Entropy Dense Zen 5c Core (CPPC 135) */
> +		if (!is_smt_secondary) {
> +			cap = 664UL;
> +			itmt_prio = 135;
> +		} else {
> +			cap = 512UL;
> +			itmt_prio = 105;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu), cap);
> +	sched_set_itmt_core_prio(itmt_prio, cpu);
> +}
> +
>   static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   {
>   	int ret, prio;
> @@ -831,6 +894,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   	} else {
>   		cpudata->hw_prefcore = true;
>   	}
> +
> +	amd_pstate_update_hetero_capacity(cpudata->cpu,
> +					  READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf));
> +	if (cpudata->cpu == num_online_cpus() - 1)
> +		sched_set_itmt_support();
>   }


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-14  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <A>
2026-11-13  1:26 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/amd, cpufreq/amd-pstate, amd_hfi: Fix Zen 5 / Zen 5c interleaving capacity & V/F knee scaling on Ryzen AI 300 (Family 1Ah Model 60h) Aiden Hecker
2026-11-13  1:26   ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Detect Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid topology via CPUID 0x80000026 and program cpu_scale Aiden Hecker
2026-11-14  6:02     ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-11-13  1:26   ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/hfi: Enforce Zen 5 vs Zen 5c asymmetric capacity and V/F knee ceiling on Krackan Point Aiden Hecker
2026-11-14  6:03     ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecc3eeb4-30d7-4d0c-b899-ab281c240964@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=heckeraiden@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox