From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "David McFarland" <corngood@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@inka.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/intel/hid: Don't wake on 5-button releases
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:36:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed891842-a86f-4ca8-af29-f7921a259146@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318191153.6978-2-corngood@gmail.com>
Hi David,
Thank you for your patch.
I became aware of this patch because the discussion on the regressions
list. Next time for patches to files under drivers/platform/x86/
at a minimum please Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org and
preferably also send the patch directly to me and Ilpo as shown
by get_maintainer.pl:
[hans@shalem linux]$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com> (maintainer:INTEL VIRTUAL BUTTON DRIVER)
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> (maintainer:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> (maintainer:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS)
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org (open list:INTEL VIRTUAL BUTTON DRIVER)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Please make sure you are sending this to the right people for v2.
On 3/18/24 8:11 PM, David McFarland wrote:
> If, for example, the power button is configured to suspend, holding it
> and releasing it after the machine has suspended, will wake the machine.
>
> Also on some machines, power button release events are sent during
> hibernation, even if the button wasn't used to hibernate the machine.
> This causes hibernation to be aborted.
>
As discussed by Thorsten this needs a fixes tag, to help with backporting
it to relevant stable kernels. Also for v2 please don't forget to add
Enrik's Tested-by from elsewhere in thread:
Tested-by: Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@inka.de>
> Signed-off-by: David McFarland <corngood@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> index 7457ca2b27a6..707de9895965 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
> struct platform_device *device = context;
> struct intel_hid_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&device->dev);
> unsigned long long ev_index;
> + struct key_entry *ke;
> int err;
>
> /*
> @@ -545,11 +546,16 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
> if (event == 0xc0 || !priv->array)
> return;
>
> - if (!sparse_keymap_entry_from_scancode(priv->array, event)) {
> + ke = sparse_keymap_entry_from_scancode(priv->array, event);
> +
I would prefer for there to be no empty line between the "ke =" assignment
and the "if (!ke)".
Otherwise the patch looks good to me, so for v3
you can add:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
After fixing this + adding the Fixes and Tested-by tags.
Regards,
Hans
> + if (!ke) {
> dev_info(&device->dev, "unknown event 0x%x\n", event);
> return;
> }
>
> + if (ke->type == KE_IGNORE)
> + return;
> +
> wakeup:
> pm_wakeup_hard_event(&device->dev);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 19:11 [PATCH 0/1] Failure to hibernate on Dell Latitude 7430 David McFarland
2024-03-18 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/intel/hid: Don't wake on 5-button releases David McFarland
2024-03-29 13:51 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-03-29 18:06 ` David McFarland
2024-03-30 6:54 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-01 15:36 ` Enrik Berkhan
2024-04-02 11:36 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-04-04 11:41 ` [PATCH v2] " David McFarland
2024-04-04 18:35 ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-08 15:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-03-21 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/1] Failure to hibernate on Dell Latitude 7430 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed891842-a86f-4ca8-af29-f7921a259146@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=Enrik.Berkhan@inka.de \
--cc=corngood@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).