From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: fix compile-test defaults
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:56:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f151f848-d337-4bf3-b88d-8a032e843ae1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417072838.734-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
On 17/04/2025 09:28, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Commit 3f66425a4fc8 ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
> enabled compile testing of most Arm CPUFreq drivers but left the
> existing default values unchanged so that many drivers are enabled by
> default whenever COMPILE_TEST is selected.
>
> This specifically results in the S3C64XX CPUFreq driver being enabled
> and initialised during boot of non-S3C64XX platforms with the following
> error logged:
>
> cpufreq: Unable to obtain ARMCLK: -2
>
> Commit d4f610a9bafd ("cpufreq: Do not enable by default during compile
> testing") recently fixed most of the default values, but two entries
> were missed and two could use a more specific default condition.
>
> Fix the default values for drivers that can be compile tested and that
> should be enabled by default when not compile testing.
>
> Fixes: 3f66425a4fc8 ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
I would not consider original code a bug, but a feature, however I am
fine with other choice as well, so to close discussion from my side:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 7:28 [PATCH v3] cpufreq: fix compile-test defaults Johan Hovold
2025-04-17 7:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-04-17 8:06 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f151f848-d337-4bf3-b88d-8a032e843ae1@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox