From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
l.majewski@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:19:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9e3746a815c08274f1a7157a709499bee32f98f.1375530162.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1375530162.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1375530162.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
For iterating over all policies currently we are iterating over all CPUs and
then finding their policies. Lets use the newly created infrastructure
cpufreq_policy_list.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 4c3aef0..e9b969f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -983,8 +983,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+ struct cpufreq_policy *tpolicy;
struct cpufreq_governor *gov;
- int sibling;
#endif
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
@@ -1004,11 +1004,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
- struct cpufreq_policy *cp = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, sibling);
- if (cp && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cp->related_cpus)) {
+ list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(cp, cpu, dev, frozen);
+ return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev,
+ frozen);
}
}
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-03 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-03 11:49 [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Cleanup header files included in core Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: Give consistent names for struct cpufreq_policy * Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 13:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: Use sizeof(*ptr) form for finding size of a struct Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: Fix broken usage of governor->owner's refcount Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: Don't use cpufreq_driver->owner's refcount to protect critical sections Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Remove struct cpufreq_driver's owner field Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9e3746a815c08274f1a7157a709499bee32f98f.1375530162.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).