From: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel 5.2+: suspend freeze in VMware Player.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:48:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd0e4df9-9619-8465-37e6-0ed14e4a2912@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1725395.bLeSF54TfN@kreacher>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, November 23, 2019 11:51:19 PM CET Woody Suwalski wrote:
>> Rafael, Thomas, this is the same VMware Player 15.2 freeze on suspend issue
>> I have been discussing with you in August.
>>
>> It has surfaced after Thomas Gleixner's change in kernel 5.2
>> dfe0cf8b x86/ioapic: Implement irq_get irqchip_state() callback
>>
>> It is still with us in 5.4, 100% repeatable on a second suspend after a
>> reboot.
>>
>> I have traced it down to the ioapic_irq_get_chip_state() function, where
>> rentry.rr is stuck hi.
>>
>> On the first suspend I can see that for IRQ9 the test exits with irr=0,
>> trigger=1, but on second and consecutive suspends it is returning
>> irr=1 trigger=1, so *state=1, and this results in a never-ending loop
>> in __synchronize_hardirq(), because inprogress is always 1.
>>
>> I have been usig a "fix" to timeout in __synchronize_hardirq() after
>> 64 iterations, and that seems to work OK (no side-effects noticed),
>> but of course is not addressing the underlying problem.
>>
>> And the problem may be somewhere in VMware emulation code, returning bad
>> data?
>>
>> Would you have ideas as to what should be the right setting for
>> IRQ9 in VM environment? Edge or level?
>> And which part of code is reading the "hardware" state from VMware?
>>
>> OTOH, current implementation is not really safe, as the wait loop should
> It is not clear to me the current implementation of what exactly you mean here.
Sorry, by implementation I have meant the source code of a never-ending
loop where suspend may be indefinitely blocked by a flaky hardware bit.
The result is a frozen VM. (check kernel/irq/manage.c line 73 on version
5.4)
>> have a timeout, or else it may get stuck. Should I provide my safety-exit patch?
> Thanks!
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-26 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bc51bc4e-21e5-d6a9-22ee-7c1194deefc8@gmail.com>
2019-11-25 14:13 ` kernel 5.2+: suspend freeze in VMware Player Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 2:48 ` Woody Suwalski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd0e4df9-9619-8465-37e6-0ed14e4a2912@gmail.com \
--to=terraluna977@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).