From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: core: Add sanity checks for polling_delay and passive_delay
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:02:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe954bb1-c6d1-4534-8f5e-eb965de19475@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5802156.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net>
On 11/07/2024 14:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> If polling_delay is nonzero and passive_delay is greater than
> polling_delay, the thermal zone temperature will be updated less
> often when tz->passive is nonzero, which is not as expected. Make
> the thermal zone registration fail with -EINVAL in that case as
> this is a clear thermal zone configuration mistake.
>
> If polling_delay is nonzero and passive_delay is 0, which is regarded
> as a valid thermal zone configuration, the thermal zone will use polling
> except when tz->passive is nonzero. However, the expected behavior in
> that case is to continue temperature polling with the same delay value
> regardless of tz->passive, so set passive_delay to the polling_delay
> value then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> This supersedes
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4940808.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net/
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,14 @@ thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(
> if (num_trips > 0 && !trips)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> + if (polling_delay) {
> + if (passive_delay > polling_delay)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + if (!passive_delay)
> + passive_delay = polling_delay;
> + }
> +
> if (!thermal_class)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
>
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 12:39 [PATCH v3] thermal: core: Add sanity checks for polling_delay and passive_delay Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-07-11 15:02 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe954bb1-c6d1-4534-8f5e-eb965de19475@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox