From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:41:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> <20070227105922.GD2250@kernel.dk> <20070227111515.GA4271@kernel.dk> <20070301093450.GA8508@elte.hu> <20070302100704.GB2293@elf.ucw.cz> <20070305084257.GA4464@mellanox.co.il> <20070305101120.GA23032@elte.hu> <45ECFC5F.7000102@garzik.org> <45ED0BBF.1050000@intel.com> <20070306090444.GA25409@elte.hu> <45ED8A12.5040803@intel.com> <45EEE8CF.1060803@intel.com> <45EEEC2C.5090609@intel.com> <45F1E876.5090102@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45F1E876.5090102@intel.com> (Auke Kok's message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:06:30 -0800") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Kok, Auke" Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Pavel Machek , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Michal Piotrowski List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org "Kok, Auke" writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > [CHOP] > >> Below is an additional set of warnings that should help debug this. >> The old code just got lucky that it triggered a warning when this happen= s. > > > I'm trying this patch together with the other 2 that you sent out a few d= ays > ago. I'm seeing some minor issues with this and lots of bogus warnings as= far as > I can see. > > If I suspend/resume and unload e1000, then reinsert e1000.ko, I immediate= ly hit > the WARN_ON at `msi.c:516: WARN_ON(!hlist_empty(&dev->saved_cap_space));` > > I'm not sure that's useful debugging information. even though saved state= exists > the module has been removed, so you might want to purge the state table w= hen the > driver gets removed? > > > anyway, back to testing. Sorry I should have been clear. With the last two patches I sent out: pci: Repair pci_save/restore_state so we can restore one save many times. msi: Safer state caching. Those WARN_ON's are now totally bogus. = In essence the WARN_ON's were testing to ensure pci_save_state and pci_restore_state were paired. The assumptions was that pci_restore_state would remove everything from the list that pci_save_state placed on it. When I reworked the code and removed the bogus pairing requirement it meant that if we ever save state and have a pci-e or pci-x capability we will have a state structure on the list until the kernel reboots. = In summary: pci_save_state and pci_restore_state were making a wrong assumption about the world. The WARN_ON patch tested to ensure the world matched those functions. When I fixed those functions to match the world the WARN_ON's became completely bogus. Eric