From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:18:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20061108085235.GT4729@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061108085235.GT4729@stusta.de> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:52:35 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , Len Brown , gregkh@suse.de, Thierry Vignaud , discuss@x86-64.org, Ernst Herzberg , Aaron Durbin , Olivier Mondoloni , Alex Romosan , ak@suse.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner , Arjan van de Ven , Bryan O'Sullivan , Linus Torvalds , linux-pm@osdl.org, Tim Chen , Jeff Chua , Paolo Ornati , phil.el@wanadoo.fr, Matthew Wilcox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk writes: > Subject : x86_64: NR_IRQ increase causes 11.5% slowdown > in lmbench's fork benchmark > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/2/192 > Submitter : Tim Chen > Caused-By : Eric W. Biederman > commit 550f2299ac8ffaba943cf211380d3a8d3fa75301 > Status : unknown I'm not really certain who to cc on this one. It appears the problem sequence is: fork() sched_setaffinity() It got worse just because NR_IRQS doubled (and all of the associated arrays doubled in size). I haven't seen anyone reproduce this but Tim Chen, and Tim wasn't able to root cause the problem so I believe we are going to have this regression :( Eric