From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:23:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0v8kodp14.fsf_-_@amazon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j1CBe7Hjhg7Tzm3HkuinA9zgtPffMtd96ZaOds=US+xQ@mail.gmail.com> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:58:47 +0100")
Hi Rafael,
On Mon, Jan 30 2023, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:18 PM Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 29 2022, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:58 PM Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Rafael,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 28 2022, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > When _PPC returns 0, it means that the CPU frequency is not limited by
>> >> > the platform firmware, so make acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
>> >> > update the frequency QoS request used by it to "no limit" in that case.
>> >> >
>> >> > This addresses a problem with limiting CPU frequency artificially on
>> >> > some systems after CPU offline/online to the frequency that corresponds
>> >> > to the first entry in the _PSS return package.
>> >> >
>> >> > Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> >> > ---
>> [...]
>> >>
>> >> One small thing I noticed: in acpi_processor_ppc_init() "no limit" value
>> >> is set to INT_MAX and here it is set to FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE. Both
>> >> should evaluate to the same value but I think it would be nice if the
>> >> same thing is used in both places. Perhaps you can fix that up when
>> >> applying?
>> >
>> > Yes, I'll do that.
>>
>> Following up on this series. I do not see it queued anywhere in the
>> linux-pm [0] tree. I would like to have this in the v6.3 merge window if
>> possible.
>>
>> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/
>
> It's already in the mainline:
>
> e8a0e30b742f cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching
> 99387b016022 ACPI: processor: perflib: Avoid updating frequency QoS
> unnecessarily
> c02d5feb6e2f ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS
Hmm, I skimmed through the git log and did not spot any of these. Seems
like they were buried deeper in the logs due to merges. I can see them
now. My bad.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-27 19:51 [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 19:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 20:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-28 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 14:22 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-28 21:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-29 12:58 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-29 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 14:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-01-30 14:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 15:23 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2023-02-14 13:40 ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-02-14 14:25 ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: processor: perflib: Avoid updating frequency QoS unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs0v8kodp14.fsf_-_@amazon.de \
--to=ptyadav@amazon.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).