From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET Date: 29 Mar 2007 22:46:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <460BBD1B.4040308@ru.mvista.com> <200703291531.18253.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <200703291546.48996.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <20070329175117.GA5521@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070329175117.GA5521@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Maxim Levitsky , Jeff Chua , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov , jgarzik@pobox.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > = > there's no fundamental reason. x86_64 COW-ed hpet_timer.c and = > time_hpet.c years ago and drifted off into different areas. Not quite -- x86-64 did HPET long before i386; the only stuff cowed was the character driver support code. But the core HPET code was always totally different code streams. We never did the complicated = pluggable clock code i386 did though -- i never quite saw the point of that because there aren't that many timers there. Of course it is already obsolete with clocksources now. -Andi