* Re: 4 adsl lines in one nic
@ 2006-06-02 16:10 Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 17:04 ` Marcos Dione
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcos Dione @ 2006-06-02 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Quoting Bill Unruh <unruh@physics.ubc.ca>:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Marcos Dione wrote:
>> hi all. first of all, I'm not suscribed to this list, so please cc: me in
>> the answers. I hope my preventive cc: to myself does the work for you; just
>> «reply-to-all».
>>
>> I'm setting up a machine with 4 ADSL lines connected to the same nic via a
>> switch. I'm not sure this is `supported´ or if I should add the 3 extra nics
>> it `should´ have.
>
> No idea what it is that you are trying to accomplish. By switch, do you
> mean a physical rotary type switch, or an ethernet switch.
> The adsl lines I assume come into modems. Then you have an ethernet
> connection from the modem to the "switch". Why? Why would you want 4 ADSL
> lines? How are you going to route them?
yes, it's an ethernet switch. the four adsl lines will be connected to one
machine and used in a load balancing scheme, but that? another story. we're
connecting the 4 lines to one nic due to hardware limitations.
> Then are you running pppoe on those lines? Is that what the relationship to
> ppp is?
I need to run pppoe on these lines to get the service.
> Not surprising you cannot do proxyarp. The machines MUST be on the same
> subnet to do proxyarp.
it's not my problem. I should have ommited that line.
>> I'm starting to think that those are configure-acks `routed´ to the wrong
>> pppd, because if I bring up one line at a time, all establish the connection
>> succesfully. I just wanted to make sure I was reaching to the correct
>> conclusion.
>>
>> also, would it be possible to make pppd abort if too much bad
>> configure-acks? since I'm the one with the problem, I'm interested
>> in hacking
>
> Why? especially since it eventually works?
it works *sometimes*.
>> that. do you think it does any sense, or should I stop doing stupid
>> things and
>> put one nic per ADSL line?
>
> If you are paid more than 10 cents per hour, that would probably be cheaper.
not everything is money. now I'm plain wondering if this could work or not.
--
Marcos Dione
Departamento de Cómputos
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas - UNC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Facultad de Ciencias QuÃmicas - Universidad Nacional de CÃrdoba
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4 adsl lines in one nic
2006-06-02 16:10 4 adsl lines in one nic Marcos Dione
@ 2006-06-02 17:04 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 18:35 ` Michal Ostrowski
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcos Dione @ 2006-06-02 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Quoting Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>:
> The Linux kernel component identifies PPPoE sessions using (SID,MAC
> ADDR) pairs. Thus, it should handle this case correctly.
> (See /proc/net/pppoe for a current listing of active sessions.)
I have no such file here, not even in the whole /proc tree. kernel version
is 2.6.15-1-686 from debian etch.
--
Marcos Dione
Departamento de Cómputos
Facultad de Ciencias QuÃmicas - UNC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Facultad de Ciencias QuÃmicas - Universidad Nacional de CÃrdoba
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4 adsl lines in one nic
2006-06-02 16:10 4 adsl lines in one nic Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 17:04 ` Marcos Dione
@ 2006-06-02 18:35 ` Michal Ostrowski
2006-06-05 14:29 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-05 14:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ostrowski @ 2006-06-02 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Ah... do you know if you are even using the kernel-assisted pppoe? I
assume that is not the case.
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:04 -0300, Marcos Dione wrote:
> Quoting Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>:
> > The Linux kernel component identifies PPPoE sessions using (SID,MAC
> > ADDR) pairs. Thus, it should handle this case correctly.
> > (See /proc/net/pppoe for a current listing of active sessions.)
>
> I have no such file here, not even in the whole /proc tree. kernel version
> is 2.6.15-1-686 from debian etch.
>
--
Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4 adsl lines in one nic
2006-06-02 16:10 4 adsl lines in one nic Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 17:04 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 18:35 ` Michal Ostrowski
@ 2006-06-05 14:29 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-05 14:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcos Dione @ 2006-06-05 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Quoting Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>:
> Ah... do you know if you are even using the kernel-assisted pppoe? I
> assume that is not the case.
I really don't know. I don't see any loaded module except these:
$ lsmod
Module Size Used by
ppp_deflate 5664 0
zlib_deflate 20536 1 ppp_deflate
bsd_comp 5376 0
ppp_async 9952 4
crc_ccitt 1952 1 ppp_async
ppp_generic 25844 19 ppp_deflate,bsd_comp,ppp_async
slhc 6240 1 ppp_generic
--
Marcos Dione
Departamento de Cómputos
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas - UNC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Facultad de Ciencias QuÃmicas - Universidad Nacional de CÃrdoba
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4 adsl lines in one nic
2006-06-02 16:10 4 adsl lines in one nic Marcos Dione
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-05 14:29 ` Marcos Dione
@ 2006-06-05 14:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ostrowski @ 2006-06-05 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 11:29 -0300, Marcos Dione wrote:
> Quoting Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>:
> > Ah... do you know if you are even using the kernel-assisted pppoe? I
> > assume that is not the case.
>
> I really don't know. I don't see any loaded module except these:
>
> $ lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> ppp_deflate 5664 0
> zlib_deflate 20536 1 ppp_deflate
> bsd_comp 5376 0
> ppp_async 9952 4
> crc_ccitt 1952 1 ppp_async
> ppp_generic 25844 19 ppp_deflate,bsd_comp,ppp_async
> slhc 6240 1 ppp_generic
>
The answer is... no.
The only PPPoE code in the picture is the plugin.
--
Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-05 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-02 16:10 4 adsl lines in one nic Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 17:04 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-02 18:35 ` Michal Ostrowski
2006-06-05 14:29 ` Marcos Dione
2006-06-05 14:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).