From: Abdul J <postabdul@yahoo.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: mlppp-link termination issue
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:24:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020072425.94102.qmail@web60102.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041015180546.26617.qmail@web60106.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi,
I see. I did not find any patches either. Thanks for
point out the previous post. I am copying this message
to Piet Louw as well. Piet, did you find any success
in dealing with the MLPPP primary link drop problem?
If anyone develops a patch, I would be more than happy
to rigorously test it (at user level) as I have a
dedicated multilink setup with 8 links.
Thanks,
Abdul
--- Steve Drew <steve.drew@empics.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use a similar setup of multilink PPP, I've not
> found any
> patches related to the improvements to pppd to make
> it RFC1990 compliant
> (re the first channel terminates).
> There was a post about 6 weeks ago, where someone
> (Piet Louw
> [ploubser@thepub.co.za]) was going to look into it,
> but there were no
> further posts from him.
>
> Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf
> Of Abdul J
> Sent: 15 October 2004 19:06
> To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: mlppp-link termination issue
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the ppp-2.4.2 version on a Redhat machine
> with Kernel 2.4.20. I use multilink option to
> combine
> (inverse multiplex) a number of satellite links to
> aggregate bandwidth. This is a test setup and I
> control both ends of the PPP connection.
>
> I observed that when the first link drops
> (terminated/disconnected) the ppp0 interface is
> dropped even though other links of the bundle are
> still connected. This results in having to restart
> all
> the connections when the first (primary) link of the
> bundle disconnects.
>
> Though this behaviour is not in accordance with RFC
> 1990, the pppd man page (of ppp-2.4.2) acknowledges
> this.
> "Currently, if the first pppd terminates (for
> example,
> because of a hangup or a received signal) the bundle
> is destroyed"
>
> My question is: Are there any plans to fix this in
> future releases of the ppp-package or are there any
> other ppp implementations in Linux that do not
> suffer
> from this problem? Is there any way to work around
> this problem.
>
> Please share your comments
>
> Thanks
> Abdul
>
>
>
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 18:05 mlppp-link termination issue Abdul J
2004-10-20 7:24 ` Abdul J [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041020072425.94102.qmail@web60102.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=postabdul@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).