From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abdul J Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:24:25 +0000 Subject: RE: mlppp-link termination issue Message-Id: <20041020072425.94102.qmail@web60102.mail.yahoo.com> List-Id: References: <20041015180546.26617.qmail@web60106.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041015180546.26617.qmail@web60106.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org Hi, I see. I did not find any patches either. Thanks for point out the previous post. I am copying this message to Piet Louw as well. Piet, did you find any success in dealing with the MLPPP primary link drop problem? If anyone develops a patch, I would be more than happy to rigorously test it (at user level) as I have a dedicated multilink setup with 8 links. Thanks, Abdul --- Steve Drew wrote: > Hi, > > I use a similar setup of multilink PPP, I've not > found any > patches related to the improvements to pppd to make > it RFC1990 compliant > (re the first channel terminates). > There was a post about 6 weeks ago, where someone > (Piet Louw > [ploubser@thepub.co.za]) was going to look into it, > but there were no > further posts from him. > > Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf > Of Abdul J > Sent: 15 October 2004 19:06 > To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org > Subject: mlppp-link termination issue > > Hi, > > I am using the ppp-2.4.2 version on a Redhat machine > with Kernel 2.4.20. I use multilink option to > combine > (inverse multiplex) a number of satellite links to > aggregate bandwidth. This is a test setup and I > control both ends of the PPP connection. > > I observed that when the first link drops > (terminated/disconnected) the ppp0 interface is > dropped even though other links of the bundle are > still connected. This results in having to restart > all > the connections when the first (primary) link of the > bundle disconnects. > > Though this behaviour is not in accordance with RFC > 1990, the pppd man page (of ppp-2.4.2) acknowledges > this. > "Currently, if the first pppd terminates (for > example, > because of a hangup or a received signal) the bundle > is destroyed" > > My question is: Are there any plans to fix this in > future releases of the ppp-package or are there any > other ppp implementations in Linux that do not > suffer > from this problem? Is there any way to work around > this problem. > > Please share your comments > > Thanks > Abdul > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line > "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com