linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Knut_Petersen@t-online.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mostrows@earthlink.net, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.38-rc2: Circular Locking Dependency
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:29:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110207102950.GA17044@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110206.232856.246531984.davem@davemloft.net>

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:28:56PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:25:55 +0100
> 
> > As I was hunting something different I found the following (potential)
> > problem on an openSuSE 11.3 system with kernel 2.6.38-rc2.
> > The message is triggerd by smpppd starting a dsl connection.
> > 
> > Knut
> > 
> > 
> >  NET: Registered protocol family 24
> > 
> >  ===========================> >  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> >  2.6.38-rc2-kape #7
> >  -------------------------------------------------------
> >  pppd/2529 is trying to acquire lock:
> >   (&(&pch->downl)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<f814a634>] ppp_push+0x59/0x4a8
> > [ppp_generic]
> > 
> >  but task is already holding lock:
> >   (&(&ppp->wlock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<f814ae1b>]
> > ppp_xmit_process+0x19/0x451 [ppp_generic]
> > 
> >  which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> I've stared over this trace several times and can't figure out what
> the problem is.
> 
> Paul, any idea?

We seem to have recursed in the ppp code because of (apparently)
handling a softirq inside a spin_lock_bh region. :(  If I understand
the original report correctly, the stack trace looks like this in part:

        [<c04153eb>] net_rx_action+0x3f/0xfe
        [<c0128563>] __do_softirq+0x76/0xfd
 -> #1 (_xmit_NETROM){+.-...}:
        [<c01462b2>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
        [<c0471c9c>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e
        [<c040ed60>] skb_dequeue+0x12/0x4a
        [<f814c237>] ppp_channel_push+0x2e/0x94 [ppp_generic]

So we were in ppp_channel_push, and the first thing it does is
spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl), and then it calls skb_dequeue, which did a
spin_lock_irqsave, and then somehow we get into __do_softirq.  I
thought spin_lock_bh should have stopped softirqs from running?

Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-07 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-24  9:25 [BUG] 2.6.38-rc2: Circular Locking Dependency Knut Petersen
2011-02-07  7:28 ` David Miller
2011-02-07 10:29   ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2011-02-07 10:43     ` Paul Mackerras
2011-02-08  7:51       ` Knut Petersen
2011-02-08  8:07         ` David Miller
2011-02-08 23:04           ` David Miller
2011-02-09  7:26             ` Knut Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110207102950.GA17044@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).