From: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
To: "François Cachereul" <f.cachereul@alphalink.fr>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] ppp: Allow ppp device connected to an l2tp session to change of namespace
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:43:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5269402E.2070203@katalix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526923A7.8090108@alphalink.fr>
On 24/10/13 14:41, François Cachereul wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 12:55 PM, James Chapman wrote:
>> On 24/10/13 11:30, François Cachereul wrote:
>>> Remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL flag from ppp device in ppp_connect_channel()
>>> if the device is connected to a l2tp session socket.
>>> Restore the flag in ppp_disconnect_channel().
>>
>> What about pppd's network namespace? Also, L2TP's tunnel socket (UDP or
>> L2TP/IP) will be in a different namespace if the ppp interface is moved.
>
> That's what I'm trying to achieve. I'm not using pppd and my problem is
> as follow: I need to isolate ppp devices from each other, even when
> they are connected to sessions carried by the same L2TP tunnel.
I'm thinking about the implications of a skb in the net namespace of the
ppp interface passing through a tunnel socket which is in another
namespace. I think net namespaces are completely isolated.
To keep your ppp interfaces isolated from each other, have you
considered using netfilter to prevent data being passed between ppp
interfaces?
> Also, I
> need the authentication to be terminated to know the namespace in which
> the ppp will be moved. For that, the process runs in a namespace with
> its l2tp sockets (tunnel and session) in that same namespace and each
> ppp device is moved in a specific namespace after authentication.
>
> Regards
> François
>
--
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 10:30 [RFC PATCH net-next] ppp: Allow ppp device connected to an l2tp session to change of namespace François Cachereul
2013-10-24 10:55 ` James Chapman
2013-10-24 13:41 ` François Cachereul
2013-10-24 15:43 ` James Chapman [this message]
2013-10-24 15:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2013-10-24 16:51 ` James Chapman
2013-10-25 8:27 ` François Cachereul
2013-10-25 8:24 ` François Cachereul
2013-10-24 14:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-10-25 8:05 ` terry white
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5269402E.2070203@katalix.com \
--to=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=f.cachereul@alphalink.fr \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox