From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>,
James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>,
Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 11:56:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717da5ac-a020-4710-8ebb-6ed9d6e48bf4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410171056.GD469338@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 4/11/2026 1:10 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:36:20AM +0800, Qingfang Deng wrote:
>> @@ -1361,7 +1376,7 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>> struct pppoe_hdr hdr;
>> __be16 proto;
>> } *hdr, _hdr;
>> - u16 ppp_proto;
>> + __be16 ppp_proto;
>
> I'm unclear of the relationship between changing the type of ppp_proto
> and the problem described in the patch description. And it
> is creating a log of churn in this patch. I suggest dropping it.
The intention is to restore the original behavior before the blamed
commit. If you find it too verbose for a fix, I can drop it and then
repost that part later to net-next.
>> @@ -1374,27 +1389,19 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - /* least significant bit of the most significant octet
>> - * indicates if protocol field was compressed
>> - */
>> - ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto);
>> - if (ppp_proto & 0x0100) {
>> - ppp_proto = ppp_proto >> 8;
>> - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN - 1;
>> - } else {
>> - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>> - }
>
> Could we go for something like this?
>
> ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto);
> nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>
> /* Explanation of what is going on */
> if (ppp_proto & 0x0100)
> ppp_proto = some invalid value like 0
>
I think it is redundant. ppp_proto_is_valid() already requires
uncompressed frames.
>> + ppp_proto = hdr->proto;
>> + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>>
>> - if (ppp_proto == PPP_IP) {
>> + if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IP)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_IPV6) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_MPLS_UC) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_UC)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_MPLS_MC) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_MC)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_MC);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> } else if (ppp_proto_is_valid(ppp_proto)) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 3:36 [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 3:36 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] pppoe: drop " Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 17:11 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-10 17:10 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE " Simon Horman
2026-04-11 3:56 ` Qingfang Deng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717da5ac-a020-4710-8ebb-6ed9d6e48bf4@linux.dev \
--to=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=carlsonj@workingcode.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaco@uls.co.za \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox