From: "Ludovic MARCILLY" <lmarcilly@aressi.fr>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re-4: Authentication problems
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:21:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIIE.000007710001E2CB@aressi.fr> (raw)
Ok. So if i want my client to authenticate with CHAP, i have to put these options in my config file on the client side:
refuse-pap
refuse-eap
refuse-mschap
refuse-mschap-v2
Am i right? I will test it now in order to be sure.
And if i just configure authentication on the server? For example, no require-[pap|chap|eap|mschap|mschap-v2] and no refuse-[pap|chap|eap|mschap|mschap-v2] in the config file on the client side but just enable chap on the server side. Will it work?
Thanks a lot for your help. I have difficulties to understand the require and refuse options.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Re-2: Authentication problems (12-sept.-2006 13:21)
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
To: lmarcilly@aressi.fr
> Gilles Espinasse writes:
> > > So i can't put these options in the config file on the client side? If i
> > > understand, he server ask the client for PAP, CHAP or MS-CHAP method to
> > > authenticate? The client doesn't choose authentication method? Is it right?
> > >
> > If one authentication is not configured on the client side, pppd will
> > answer
> > with a nak on the request and could offer another authentication method if
> > available (that the server may or not accept).
>
> "Configured" in this case means that pppd has access to credentials --
> a user name and pass phrase or shared secret for a given
> authentication protocol -- and that it's not told _not_ to use them.
>
> On the authenticatee ("client") side, all that you can do is agree to
> the peer's request or suggest an alternative; you can't demand to be
> identified with a given protocol.
>
> Authentication must work that way. Allowing the authenticatee to
> specify the means of validation is insecure.
>
> On the other side, if you're setting up a "server," you use the
> 'require-pap' keyword (note that "+pap" is obsolescent) to say that
> the peers must use PAP to identify themselves.
>
> --
> James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
To: carlsonj@workingcode.com
g.esp@free.fr
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-12 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-12 12:21 Ludovic MARCILLY [this message]
2006-09-12 12:27 ` Re-4: Authentication problems James Carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIIE.000007710001E2CB@aressi.fr \
--to=lmarcilly@aressi.fr \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox