From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony.chamberlain@lemko.com Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:35:22 +0000 Subject: Re: Banyan Vines Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org -----Original Message----- From: James Carlson [mailto:carlsonj@workingcode.com] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 03:09 PM To: 'Michael St. Laurent' Cc: tony.chamberlain@lemko.com, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Banyan Vines Michael St. Laurent writes: > Might it not also be that the client connecting has the Banyan Vines > protocol installed? That's probably _really_ unlikely in 2008. ;-} Plus, the original poster noted that he had this: > > > (along with a lot of unsupported protocol messages which are just > > > hex values), or what to do about it? That almost certainly makes Banyan Vines a red herring. We just happened to see a corrupted packet that started with hex 35 or 00 35. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W ============ Especially since the VPN had been working (with mmpe or is it mppe?) for 6 or 7 months. Could it be hackers?