From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Ionut Turturica" <ionut.turturica@galati.uti.ro>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:46:44 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCP problem
Message-Id: <op.s35tf6n1blqxiz@jono>
List-Id: <linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org>
References: <op.s35d59crblqxiz@jono>
In-Reply-To: <op.s35d59crblqxiz@jono>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org


Yes, when MPPE is disabled the link comes up but obviously I don't want a  
not encrypted link. The confusing thing is that Windows' native PPTP  
client works just fine, pppd does not. I have no idea what software the  
peer uses and I can't find out, my guess is that it's a M$ Windows.

It would be nice to have some similar logs from windows' client to see how  
does it handle this. There must be a bug in the peer software.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:20:49 +0200, James Carlson  
<carlsonj@workingcode.com> wrote:

> Ionut Turturica writes:
>> It looks like the pptpd server requests first time mppe-stateful, then  
>> it
>> changes its mind and wants mppe-stateless. Is there any way to fix this?
>> (I don't have access to pptpd's config)
>
> That's not how I read this log.
>
>> sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
>
> The local system tells its peer that it would like to do 128 bit MPPE
> (+S) with stateless mode (+H).
>
>> rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
>
> The peer says that it doesn't want to use MPPE or CCP at all.  Are you
> sure that you should be using MPPE with this peer?
>
>> sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x1]
>
> The local system agrees to avoid MPPE for the peer!  That looks like a
> bug to me.  It's theoretically possible, to encrypt in just one
> direction, but it doesn't sound like a good thing.  This should have
> been a CCP Configure-Nak instead.
>
>> rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 <mppe -H -M +S -L -D -C>]
>
> The peer says that it agrees to 128 bit MPPE, but only if stateful
> (-H) mode is used.
>
>> sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mppe -H -M +S -L -D -C>]
>
> We re-request using the peer's options.
>
>> rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mppe -H -M +S -L -D -C>]
>> MPPE 128-bit stateful receive compression enabled
>
> MPPE is now up in one direction (data sent from the peer to this
> system -- the receive side -- should be encrypted, the other side is
> not).
>
>> rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
>> MPPE disabled
>
> The peer is pretty confused.  It just restarted CCP negotiation for no
> apparent reason.  As a result, we've torn down MPPE, as required by
> the protocol.
>
>> sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "MPPE disabled"]
>> sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
>> sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x1]
>
> We're apparently trying to restart CCP.
>
>> rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
>
> The peer loses its mind and shuts down the link.
>
> I'm not sure that the peer agrees that this link should be using MPPE
> at all.  Though there's one anomalous thing coming out of pppd, it
> seems to me that the real problems here are on the peer's side.
>
> Other than disabling MPPE entirely, I'm not sure what you can do to
> fix this.
>