From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Ionut Turturica" <ionut.turturica@galati.uti.ro>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:01:41 +0000
Subject: Re: PPPoE stuff
Message-Id: <op.s4kko3rnblqxiz@jono>
List-Id: <linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org>
References: <op.s4kigj0bblqxiz@jono.amd>
In-Reply-To: <op.s4kigj0bblqxiz@jono.amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org


Indeed, the XP machine doesn't receive any ppp packet as if anything  
that's written to that pty is lost :/

PS: ignore that pptp messages..I used same log file for both pptp and  
pppoe.

On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:27:20 +0200, James Carlson  
<carlsonj@workingcode.com> wrote:

> Ionut Turturica writes:
>> Any hints for this?
>> I'm trying to connect a XP machine with a rp-pppoe server. I see that XP
>> client keeps requesting CallBack, and we refuse it..
>
> The lack of response to your LCP Configure-Request messages (he should
> have sent at least an ack or nak) seems to indicate that this is a
> low-level communications problem of some sort.  No packets are getting
> through at all, so negotiation is simply impossible.  PPP is running,
> but the PPPoE mechanism is failing.
>
>> Feb  6 22:06:42 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
>> buffering packet 1003 (expecting 1000, lost or reordered)
> [...]
>> Feb  6 22:06:58 lfs pppoe-server[31611]: Sent PADT
>
> That's sort of scary.  Is this PPTP, PPPoE, or what?  Why messages
> from both?  (Or are those just unrelated?)
>