Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable

Daniel Vetter
2015-05-06T14:08:50Z

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:11:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com> wrote:
> > The CRC (Crystal Cove) PMIC, controls the panel enable and disable
> > signals for BYT for dsi panels. This is indicated in the VBT fields. Use
> > that to initialize and use GPIO based control for these signals.
> >
> > v2: Use the newer gpiod interface(Alexandre)
> > v3: Remove the redundant checks and unused code (Ville)
> >
> > CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > index 5196642..be55ffa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> > #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> > #include "intel_dsi.h"
> > @@ -415,6 +416,12 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> >
> > + /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
> > + if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(intel_dsi->gpio_panel, 1);
> > +
> > + msleep(intel_dsi->panel_on_delay);
> > +
> > /* Disable DPOunit clock gating, can stall pipe
> > * and we need DPLL REFA always enabled */
> > tmp = I915_READ(DPLL(pipe));
> > @@ -432,8 +439,6 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > /* put device in ready state */
> > intel_dsi_device_ready(encoder);
> >
> > - msleep(intel_dsi->panel_on_delay);
> > -
> > drm_panel_prepare(intel_dsi->panel);
> >
> > for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> > @@ -576,6 +581,10 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >
> > msleep(intel_dsi->panel_off_delay);
> > msleep(intel_dsi->panel_pwr_cycle_delay);
> > +
> > + /* Panel Disable over CRC PMIC */
> > + if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(intel_dsi->gpio_panel, 0);
> > }
> >
> > static bool intel_dsi_get_hw_state(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > @@ -955,6 +964,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> > /* XXX: Logically this call belongs in the panel driver. */
> > drm_panel_remove(intel_dsi->panel);
> > }
> > +
> > + /* dispose of the gpios */
> > + if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
> > + gpiod_put(intel_dsi->gpio_panel);
> > +
> > intel_encoder_destroy(encoder);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1071,6 +1085,20 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * In case of BYT with CRC PMIC, we need to use GPIO for
> > + * Panel control.
> > + */
> > + if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->pwm_blc == PPS_BLC_PMIC) {
> > + intel_dsi->gpio_panel =
> > + gpiod_get(dev->dev, "panel", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR(intel_dsi->gpio_panel)) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("Failed to own gpio for panel control\n");
> > + intel_dsi->gpio_panel = NULL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI;
> > intel_encoder->cloneable = 0;
> > drm_connector_init(dev, connector, &intel_dsi_connector_funcs,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > index 2784ac4..bf1bade 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> > #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> >
> > +#define PPS_BLC_PMIC 0
> > +#define PPS_BLC_SOC 1
>
> Since these values are defined in the VBT, perhaps these should be in
> intel_bios.h. Up to you, I'm fine either way.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Yeah if they're vbt it's better to keep all that together. Maybe we'll
eventually get a bright future where vbt documentation is solid, and then
it's good to have it all in one place.
-Daniel

>
>
> > +
> > /* Dual Link support */
> > #define DSI_DUAL_LINK_NONE 0
> > #define DSI_DUAL_LINK_FRONT_BACK 1
> > @@ -42,6 +45,9 @@ struct intel_dsi {
> > struct drm_panel *panel;
> > struct intel_dsi_host *dsi_hosts[I915_MAX_PORTS];
> >
> > + /* GPIO Desc for CRC based Panel control */
> > + struct gpio_desc *gpio_panel;
> > +
> > struct intel_connector *attached_connector;
> >
> > /* bit mask of ports being driven */
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org