linux-pwm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	vz@mleia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit in lpc32xx_pwm_disable
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:26:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466601964.5316.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622123222.GD26943@ulmo.ba.sec>

Hi Thierry,

On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:32 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> > 
> > If the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit is setup to 1 in the bootloader, when the kernel
> > disable the PWM, the PWM output is always set as a logic 1.
> 
> I presume there's a reason why the bootloader set this bit to 1. Why do
> you assume it's the right thing to clear it?
> 
There is an alternative mode for the PWM output pin; using the 
PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit to control the PWM output (logical 0 or 1 on 
output) when the PWM is disable.

In this case, the bootloader is using the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit
to control the PWM output (always 1) to enable the LCD; the 
application is using the PWM to control the intensity of the 
LCD output. When disabling the PWM, the line level should be 
setup to 0.

A version 2 of this patch will be send with support to select 
the alternate PWM disable level high from the device tree.

For details, you can refer to:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/3882/focus=508758


Sylvain

> Thierry

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-03 19:37 [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit in lpc32xx_pwm_disable Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-21  2:11 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-21 12:39   ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-21 21:57     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-22 12:32 ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 13:26   ` Sylvain Lemieux [this message]
2016-06-22 14:36     ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 15:10       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-22 15:30         ` Sylvain Lemieux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466601964.5316.19.camel@localhost \
    --to=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).