From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Do not instiate a platform_dev for devs without a mmio resource
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:33:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516016025.7000.992.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115093615.GA27654@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:36 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > acpi_lpss_create_device() skips handling LPSS devices which do not
> > have
> > a mmio resources in their resource list (typically these devices are
> > disabled by the firmware). But since the LPSS code does not bind to
> > the
> > device, acpi_bus_attach() ends up still creating a platform device
> > for
> > it and the regular platform_driver for the ACPI HID still tries to
> > bind
> > to it.
> >
> > This happens e.g. on some boards which do not use the pwm-controller
> > and have an empty or invalid resource-table for it. Currently this
> > causes
> > these error messages to get logged:
> > [ 3.281966] pwm-lpss 80862288:00: invalid resource
> > [ 3.287098] pwm-lpss: probe of 80862288:00 failed with error -22
> >
> > This commit stops the undesirable creation of a platform_device for
> > disabled LPSS devices by setting pnp.type.platform_id to 0. Note
> > that
> > acpi_scan_attach_handler() also sets pnp.type.platform_id to 0 when
> > there
> > is a matching handler for the device and that handler has no attach
> > callback, so we simply behave as a handler without an attach
> > function
> > in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Seems like a good way to fix it IMHO,
Yeah, looks much better for my opinion than previous hack to PWM
platform driver.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 20:01 [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Do not instiate a platform_dev for devs without a mmio resource Hans de Goede
2018-01-14 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-15 8:42 ` Hans de Goede
2018-01-15 9:36 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-01-15 11:33 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516016025.7000.992.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).