* [PATCH v3 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC @ 2020-08-13 16:04 vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko, lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> Hi, This patch set enables support for PWM on the Intel Keem Bay SoC. Keem Bay is an ARM based SoC, and the GPIO module allows configuration of 6 PWM outputs. Patch 1 adds the PWM driver and Patch 2 is for the required Device Tree bindings documentation. This driver was tested on the Keem Bay evaluation module board. Thank you. Best regards, Vineetha Changes since v2: -Include documentation about HW limitation/behaviour -Use hex values for KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX -Redefine register macros -Utilize FIELD_GET/FIELD_PREP for calculating pwm_l/h_count and pwm_count -Round up duty cycle/period values -Get current hardware state in .apply instead of cached values -Do a polarity check before .enabled -Round high time/low time to closest value -Set enable bit in KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET to 0 in probe -Correct the naming for MODULE_ALIAS -Add additionalProperties: false in DT bindings Changes since v1: -Updated licensing info, "clocks" property and example in DT bindings -Updated name of DT bindings document to match compatible string -Removed 1 patch for addition of new sysfs attribute "count" -Added support for COMPILE_TEST in Kconfig -Updated naming of defines and regmap attribute -Updated calculation of waveform high time and low time -Added range checking for waveform high/low time -Implemented .get_state -Removed register writes for lead-in and count values (left to default) -Updated register access to single-access -Folded keembay_pwm_enable/disable_channel, keembay_pwm_config_period/duty_cycle, and keembay_pwm_config into keembay_pwm_apply -Updated error messages/error codes -Removed pwm_disable from keembay_pwm_remove -Removed clk_prepare/clk_enable/clk_disable from driver Lai, Poey Seng (1): pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran (1): dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 47 ++++ drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 + drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 293 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay 2020-08-13 16:04 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 16:04 ` vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 19:24 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko, lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com> Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC. Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> --- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++ drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 246 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index cb8d739..2b0419b 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig @@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called pwm-zx. +config PWM_KEEMBAY + tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver" + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST + help + The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module + will be called pwm-keembay. + endif diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index a59c710..0c84ff2 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL) += pwm-twl.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED) += pwm-twl-led.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500) += pwm-vt8500.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX) += pwm-zx.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY) += pwm-keembay.o diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4e3d2e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation + * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com> + * Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> + * + * Limitation: + * - Upon disabling a channel, the currently running + * period will not be completed. However, upon + * reconfiguration of the duty cycle/period, the + * currently running period will be completed first. + */ + +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pwm.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> + +#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS 6 +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX 0xffff +#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT BIT(31) + +/* Mask */ +#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK GENMASK(31, 16) +#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK GENMASK(15, 0) +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(31, 0) + +/* PWM Register offset */ +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch) (0x00 + 4 * (ch)) +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET(ch) (0x20 + 4 * (ch)) + +struct keembay_pwm { + struct pwm_chip chip; + struct device *dev; + struct clk *clk; + void __iomem *base; +}; + +static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct pwm_chip *chip) +{ + return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip); +} + +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm *priv, u32 mask, + u32 val, u32 offset) +{ + u32 buff, tmp; + void __iomem *address; + + address = priv->base + offset; + buff = readl(address); + tmp = buff & ~mask; + tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val); + writel(tmp, address); +} + +static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) +{ + keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1, + KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch)); +} + +static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) +{ + keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0, + KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch)); +} + +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip); + unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count; + unsigned long clk_rate; + u32 buff; + + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); + + /* Read channel enabled status */ + buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm)); + if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT) + state->enabled = true; + else + state->enabled = false; + + /* Read period and duty cycle */ + buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm)); + pwm_l_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, buff) * NSEC_PER_SEC; + pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) * NSEC_PER_SEC; + state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pwm_h_count, clk_rate); + state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count, clk_rate); +} + +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip); + struct pwm_state current_state; + u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count; + unsigned long long div; + unsigned long clk_rate; + u32 pwm_count = 0; + + keembay_pwm_get_state(chip, pwm, ¤t_state); + + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) + return -ENOSYS; + + if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) { + keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm); + return 0; + } + + /* + * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET register contain + * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain + * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles. + * + * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC + * low time = clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC + * + * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz: + * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98 + * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710 + * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET = 0x3A982710 + */ + + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); + + /* Configure waveform high time */ + div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle; + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, NSEC_PER_SEC); + if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX) + return -ERANGE; + + pwm_h_count = div; + + /* Configure waveform low time */ + div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle); + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, NSEC_PER_SEC); + if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX) + return -ERANGE; + + pwm_l_count = div; + + pwm_count = FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, pwm_h_count) | + FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, pwm_l_count); + + writel(pwm_count, priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET(pwm->hwpwm)); + + if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled) + keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct pwm_ops keembay_pwm_ops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .apply = keembay_pwm_apply, + .get_state = keembay_pwm_get_state, +}; + +static int keembay_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct keembay_pwm *priv; + int ret, ch; + + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!priv) + return -ENOMEM; + + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock: %pe", priv->clk); + + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk); + } + + priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) + return PTR_ERR(priv->base); + + priv->chip.base = -1; + priv->chip.dev = dev; + priv->chip.ops = &keembay_pwm_ops; + priv->chip.npwm = KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS; + + ret = pwmchip_add(&priv->chip); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add PWM chip: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); + return ret; + } + + /* Ensure enable bit for each channel is cleared at boot */ + for (ch = 0; ch < KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS; ch++) + keembay_pwm_disable(priv, ch); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv); + + return 0; +} + +static int keembay_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct keembay_pwm *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip); +} + +static const struct of_device_id keembay_pwm_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, keembay_pwm_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver keembay_pwm_driver = { + .probe = keembay_pwm_probe, + .remove = keembay_pwm_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "pwm-keembay", + .of_match_table = keembay_pwm_of_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(keembay_pwm_driver); + +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-keembay"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 19:24 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-08-14 11:20 ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-08-13 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran Cc: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt, linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:04:05AM +0800, vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote: > From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com> > > Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC. ... > +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm *priv, u32 mask, > + u32 val, u32 offset) > +{ > + u32 buff, tmp; > + void __iomem *address; No need to have this. Just use calc in place. > + address = priv->base + offset; > + buff = readl(address); > + tmp = buff & ~mask; > + tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val); One line and one variable less: buff = (buff & ~mask) | FIELD_PREP(...); But shouldn't be u32_replace_bits() instead? > + writel(tmp, address); > +} ... > + * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC > + * low time = clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC > + * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz: > + * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98 > + * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710 Please, replace all multipliers to physical units ... 50us ... 30us ... ... 500MHz * 30us = 0x3a98 ...and so on. > + * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET = 0x3A982710 ... > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock: %pe", priv->clk); > + > + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk); return dev_err_probe(...); > + } ... > + ret = pwmchip_add(&priv->chip); > + if (ret < 0) { ' < 0' makes any sense? > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add PWM chip: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > + return ret; > + } -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay 2020-08-13 19:24 ` Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-08-14 11:20 ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha @ 2020-08-14 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shevchenko, Andriy Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie, Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai > -----Original Message----- > From: Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 3:24 AM > To: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> > Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com; u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de; > robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie > <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi > Bai <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:04:05AM +0800, > vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote: > > From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com> > > > > Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC. > > ... > > > +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm > *priv, u32 mask, > > + u32 val, u32 offset) > > +{ > > + u32 buff, tmp; > > > + void __iomem *address; > > No need to have this. Just use calc in place. > OK, will remove this. > > + address = priv->base + offset; > > > + buff = readl(address); > > > + tmp = buff & ~mask; > > + tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val); > > One line and one variable less: > > buff = (buff & ~mask) | FIELD_PREP(...); > > But shouldn't be u32_replace_bits() instead? > Thanks, I will try to switch to this instead. > > + writel(tmp, address); > > +} > > ... > > > + * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC > > + * low time = clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC > > > + * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz: > > + * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98 > > + * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710 > > Please, replace all multipliers to physical units > ... 50us ... 30us ... > ... 500MHz * 30us = 0x3a98 > ...and so on. > Noted, will fix this in V4. > > + * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET = 0x3A982710 > > ... > > > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { > > > + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock: %pe", priv->clk); > > + > > + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk); > > return dev_err_probe(...); > > > + } > > ... > > > + ret = pwmchip_add(&priv->chip); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > ' < 0' makes any sense? > OK, will change this to just use 'if (ret)' instead. > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add PWM chip: %pe\n", > ERR_PTR(ret)); > > + return ret; > > + } > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > Thanks for the comments, Andy - will make the changes and resubmit for V4. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM 2020-08-13 16:04 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 16:04 ` vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-08-13 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko, lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> Add PWM Device Tree bindings documentation for the Intel Keem Bay SoC. Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a374334 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +# Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Intel Keem Bay PWM Device Tree Bindings + +maintainers: + - Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com> + +allOf: + - $ref: pwm.yaml# + +properties: + compatible: + enum: + - intel,keembay-pwm + + reg: + maxItems: 1 + + clocks: + maxItems: 1 + + "#pwm-cells": + const: 2 + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - clocks + - '#pwm-cells' + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + #define KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO + + pwm@203200a0 { + compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm"; + reg = <0x203200a0 0xe8>; + clocks = <&scmi_clk KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO>; + #pwm-cells = <2>; + }; -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-14 11:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-08-13 16:04 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran 2020-08-13 19:24 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-08-14 11:20 ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha 2020-08-13 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).