From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824E5EB64D7 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230060AbjFWJq6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 05:46:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35466 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229451AbjFWJq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 05:46:57 -0400 Received: from imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk (imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk [78.40.148.171]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B1DE48; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [78.40.148.178] (helo=webmail.codethink.co.uk) by imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1qCdNR-00Dbvf-Tr; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:46:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:46:50 +0100 From: Ben Dooks To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Thierry Reding , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Greentime Hu , William Salmon , Jude Onyenegecha Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] DesignWare PWM driver updates In-Reply-To: References: <20230614171457.69191-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com> Message-ID: <1634a34bcd0f1b6eed5e3d59126d7892@codethink.co.uk> X-Sender: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On 2023-06-20 13:59, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 6/14/23 20:14, Ben Dooks wrote: >> This series is an update for the DesignWare PWM driver to add support >> for >> OF (and split the PCI bits out if aynone else wants them). This is >> mostly >> the same as the v7 series, but with code moved around and >> module-namespace >> added, plus review comments processed. >> >> Since we no longer have the hardware, the clock code hasn't been >> changed to >> either lock the rate whilst the PWM is running, or to deal with any >> sort >> of change callback. This is left to future work (and I would rather >> get >> something in that does currently work) (second note, the hardware we >> did >> use had a fixed clock tree anyway) >> >> This account is probably going away soon, I have cc'd my main work >> email to catch any responses. >> >> Thank you all for the reviews. >> > I tested the patchset on Intel Elkhart Lake and didn't see issues. > > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula Great, thank you. Is this series likely to get into the next kernel release? -- ben