From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4714021149C; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738610130; cv=none; b=EoYiQJLFOfMsWMt6lAtE0lNZmwwqdduFKrHa0ii2P9R1TBCvmlFM+uueaSZl1MVScydm1bITPs7QS32h92wVtRh0E1IbykdA22RPktyxA2Vot6jrSBymfPWqIJUls58xSG/whvY5orbgFCDh+hY1YxhTkF+pY9UEI2U19w8qBZc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738610130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DNa/v4L4GNkBFQVY6p5fPmrvgQMyAR2FediJooOHzq8=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=bUl9smtCwnSYg3EJTRqeVblSVJsGo3cm0NxvUhrUa7Dni7KABTM0M3HI9ABOp6ZKlr8A+RmtHhwy31pdklyld3dJ2p4t21dey86NOFDiiq2yyToaL3uY78BC+ApbGF6Go0iu59OiAIkf7kXbz7XFwhPJQJUYZTgFs+AViLkA9qw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IA6wl1kD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IA6wl1kD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268D0C4CED2; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738610130; bh=DNa/v4L4GNkBFQVY6p5fPmrvgQMyAR2FediJooOHzq8=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=IA6wl1kD76UaA590vQjC8DR1CxUfDIk/wXotpFrZMhwfiIHpu4XETt1RNAgo7S9qZ lVLQOJu21i2CVWA+BqV0mnF3y6EV4mcsaOXCBha9CcL1XG/sHlsZ16oVfZBay9LSd+ /4OSY7xiAEnSp67jxsmUGmOrjJ0w8RSvjaM++jzAVVNNugicDQOaAETQwJUwdOiEgB RvrmH3rdOg0RTni1PpklIpJf0ELAlaoq0FWqNmKj7SQkQILXjTqQ9Ry5BbiYHkS+Id yISPT3zKVcUp+/9ptx3WeWzRv3ZMnhjZ7YRZvtXWgG5tFSP9F8P3+iFerrAmNCzchK vEsIxFrxEdW2g== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D61380AA67; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 19:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pwm: microchip-core: fix incorrect comparison with max period From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org Message-Id: <173861015701.3409359.18144530519616995351.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 19:15:57 +0000 References: <20250122-pastor-fancied-0b993da2d2d2@spud> In-Reply-To: <20250122-pastor-fancied-0b993da2d2d2@spud> To: Conor Dooley Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, daire.mcnamara@microchip.com, ukleinek@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) by Uwe Kleine-König : On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:42:56 +0000 you wrote: > From: Conor Dooley > > In mchp_core_pwm_apply_locked(), if hw_period_steps is equal to its max, > an error is reported and .apply fails. The max value is actually a > permitted value however, and so this check can fail where multiple > channels are enabled. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v1] pwm: microchip-core: fix incorrect comparison with max period https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/752b6e3af374 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html