From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F96A2D; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741301462; cv=none; b=fHqKSs2ros0PPfsg9360K5iX9E9uCWgwxIxk6l8NCqdPvLKxxjiOypKaLJ1rmiPFhcMZGPWrZPmIB6VI9Xi3sJ3UFO6OANpzY0oLTDw+xz07+QvaXz857SWb1R5b01kWhVTZnObbFiWzqWqyCyhYTcPo9HO3tp0WktRrTaN7Yjw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741301462; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PQNLXZ0BI7Zw90mYxll0zwWrtFEy7breMuAbqFr1dek=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IbG5V7mfD7nvcCbog3GattNeH4HLqQN7QpoMTGEyqEggy1HBNLUS4rRcggJ17oSrsiXmxD7u4FNOnTIltl7lYN2BWefs2BTkdDAvDR5NRGzwEst4Q8uGlJYCuIh/FxS+ubCgsHFOSZP8WOJqTB5Donoe29plzE1pHj716bmAaEA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qor0ZMtI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qor0ZMtI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FBAAC4CEE0; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:51:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741301461; bh=PQNLXZ0BI7Zw90mYxll0zwWrtFEy7breMuAbqFr1dek=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=qor0ZMtIqlsb+J0MHUg5TopHRsOmRbItCbyOB6VhkI97wUSgYXiXAlOToKWp/BtXW LPt5iR2yIA3M7pMTcUVNfXvMTtfG2CBVdrr7MND9AX9NUo0Zxi23glCQwMgz2iF6bq 114Tb1k7mecVi+B/g/mn/+cRXBtEdEd2VRhc0fVnOzZ7Z07+KdJ4M3ygs2iZu23rFq o+HVT5mgGkp7v/MZkVNRJaNVwgynWWqZ+8sTFEBILZZpkrF6hX+ic+upEAdO+1Yu19 /jQXd3xBEUUgfA93Lxn1piBkPcyzvopp1MStqB5fQ/w6fft0dlUFtHL63QaZ2REehE cUJAm22V72oPA== From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij , Michael Walle , Bamvor Jian Zhang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Keerthy , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Lee Jones , Pavel Machek , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot In-Reply-To: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-1-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org> References: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-0-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org> <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-1-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org> Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants Message-Id: <174130146134.987559.8662566490718210141.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:51:01 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-510f9 On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:56:58 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > While gpiod_set_value() currently returns void, it will soon be converted > to return an integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`. > > Applied, thanks! [01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants commit: 5d5e2a6f15a6c5e0c431c1388fd90e14b448da1e -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]