From: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:09:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626120935.GA9739@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626095106.GB27083@manwe>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:51:07AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:27:27AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > Current code actually does not set MODE1_SLEEP bit because the new value for
> > bitmask (0x1) is wrong. To set MODE1_SLEEP bit, we should pass MODE1_SLEEP
> > as the new value for bitmask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> > ---
> > Hi Steffen,
> > I don't have this hardware, can you test if this patch works?
> > Thanks,
> > Axel
> >
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Steffen,
>
> are you able to test or review this? The patch seems good but I'm not
> familiar with the hardware nor do I have a board to test it on.
>
> Thierry
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > index c9f9e65..3fb775d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >
> > if (--pca->active_cnt == 0)
> > regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> > - 0x1);
> > + MODE1_SLEEP);
> > }
> >
> > static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
> > @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > struct pca9685 *pca = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >
> > - regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP, 0x1);
> > + regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> > + MODE1_SLEEP);
> >
> > return pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
> > }
> > --
Hi!
Looks good. I used regmap_update_bits wrong, obviously. I only provided
the value (0x1), but did not apply the correct mask to it, which this
version (with MODE1_SLEEP) does.
So, you may add my
Reviewed-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
Thank you Axel for fixing it,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 17:27 [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit Axel Lin
2013-06-26 9:51 ` Thierry Reding
2013-06-26 12:09 ` Steffen Trumtrar [this message]
2013-06-26 21:33 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130626120935.GA9739@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).