[PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit

[PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit

[Axel Lin]

Current code actually does not set MODE1_SLEEP bit because the new value for
bitmask (0x1) is wrong. To set MODE1_SLEEP bit, we should pass MODE1_SLEEP
as the new value for bitmask.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
Hi Steffen,
I don't have this hardware, can you test if this patch works?
Thanks,
Axel

 drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
index c9f9e65..3fb775d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 
 	if (--pca->active_cnt == 0)
 		regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
-				   0x1);
+				   MODE1_SLEEP);
 }
 
 static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
@@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct pca9685 *pca = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
-	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP, 0x1);
+	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
+			   MODE1_SLEEP);
 
 	return pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1540 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:27:27AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Current code actually does not set MODE1_SLEEP bit because the new value for
> bitmask (0x1) is wrong. To set MODE1_SLEEP bit, we should pass MODE1_SLEEP
> as the new value for bitmask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
> Hi Steffen,
> I don't have this hardware, can you test if this patch works?
> Thanks,
> Axel
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Steffen,

are you able to test or review this? The patch seems good but I'm not
familiar with the hardware nor do I have a board to test it on.

Thierry

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> index c9f9e65..3fb775d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  
>  	if (--pca->active_cnt == 0)
>  		regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> -				   0x1);
> +				   MODE1_SLEEP);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
> @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>  	struct pca9685 *pca = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>  
> -	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP, 0x1);
> +	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> +			   MODE1_SLEEP);
>  
>  	return pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit

[Steffen Trumtrar]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:51:07AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:27:27AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > Current code actually does not set MODE1_SLEEP bit because the new value for
> > bitmask (0x1) is wrong. To set MODE1_SLEEP bit, we should pass MODE1_SLEEP
> > as the new value for bitmask.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> > ---
> > Hi Steffen,
> > I don't have this hardware, can you test if this patch works?
> > Thanks,
> > Axel
> > 
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Steffen,
> 
> are you able to test or review this? The patch seems good but I'm not
> familiar with the hardware nor do I have a board to test it on.
> 
> Thierry
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > index c9f9e65..3fb775d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >  
> >  	if (--pca->active_cnt == 0)
> >  		regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> > -				   0x1);
> > +				   MODE1_SLEEP);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
> > @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  {
> >  	struct pca9685 *pca = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >  
> > -	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP, 0x1);
> > +	regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, MODE1_SLEEP,
> > +			   MODE1_SLEEP);
> >  
> >  	return pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
> >  }
> > -- 

Hi!

Looks good. I used regmap_update_bits wrong, obviously. I only provided
the value (0x1), but did not apply the correct mask to it, which this
version (with MODE1_SLEEP) does.

So, you may add my

	Reviewed-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>

Thank you Axel for fixing it,
Steffen


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: Fix wrong argument to set MODE1_SLEEP bit

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:27:27AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Current code actually does not set MODE1_SLEEP bit because the new value for
> bitmask (0x1) is wrong. To set MODE1_SLEEP bit, we should pass MODE1_SLEEP
> as the new value for bitmask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
> Hi Steffen,
> I don't have this hardware, can you test if this patch works?
> Thanks,
> Axel
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]