From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:00:09 +0200 References: <1379091281-23662-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> <201309161710.15800.marex@denx.de> <52375FDB.8090405@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <52375FDB.8090405@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201309170100.09282.marex@denx.de> List-ID: To: Stephen Warren Cc: Mike Dunn , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Chao Xie , Sergei Shtylyov , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell Dear Stephen Warren, > On 09/16/2013 09:10 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > ... > > > OK, to push it ad-absurdum, shall we not start listing every single > > revision of the CPU as well? Like pxa250a0 250a1 etc ? Yes , this > > many-to-one mapping is > > It's not about CPU revisions, it's about revisions of the SoC that > contain the IP block. But that doesn't matter if the IP block is the same in all of them. > > something I don't quite understand, that's why I'd love to see a good > > reasoning from Stephen. > > Please see the earlier discussions. I did, so I must really be slow or something. Best regards, Marek Vasut