From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pwm-backlight: 3.13-rc1 regression for old arm machine
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131217095658.GD13823@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r49c6bea.fsf@free.fr>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:52:45PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
Hi Robert,
Please always Cc the linux-pwm mailing list for PWM related questions.
I've done that now.
> Since recently, and probable since last Linus's merge of PWM tree (Merge tag
> 'pwm/for-3.13-rc1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm), my
> platform has its backlight broken.
>
> The particularity of my platform:
> - arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c
> - no device tree
> - no power supply regulator for backlight
> - backlight controlled by a PWM
> - kernel message :
> [ 1.495480] platform pwm-backlight: Driver pwm-backlight requests probe deferral
>
> I think other "old" platforms will suffer from this. Do you have a
> recommendation ?
I hadn't anticipated that =(. In fact I had been holding this patch back
for a release cycle because I was waiting for a specific regulator patch
to land which provides a dummy regulator if one wasn't specified. It
seems that that patch only works when booting from DT, though.
The correct way to fix this would be to provide a lookup table with the
dummy regulator in the board file. I've attached a patch (compile-tested
only) that might work.
If it does, please let me know and, if nobody else volunteers, I'll see
if I can come up with a set of patches to fix this for any other boards
that have the same issue.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-ARM-pxa-Add-dummy-power-supply-for-backlight-for-Mit.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1869 bytes --]
From 8c25d9b1465acd2dcd05644f2c984b54ae3dfc53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:52:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: Add dummy power supply for backlight for Mitac Mio
A701
Recent changes to the pwm-backlight driver have made the power supply
mandatory. There is code in the regulator core to deal with situations
where no regulator is specified and provide a dummy, but that works on
DT-based boards only.
The situation can be remedied by adding a dummy regulator during board
initialization.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c
index f70583fee59f..5cb3a3b33772 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include <linux/mtd/physmap.h>
#include <linux/usb/gpio_vbus.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h>
#include <linux/regulator/max1586.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -714,6 +715,10 @@ static struct gpio global_gpios[] = {
{ GPIO56_MT9M111_nOE, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "Camera nOE" },
};
+static struct regulator_consumer_supply fixed_5v0_consumers[] = {
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY("power", "pwm-backlight.0"),
+};
+
static void __init mioa701_machine_init(void)
{
int rc;
@@ -753,6 +758,10 @@ static void __init mioa701_machine_init(void)
pxa_set_i2c_info(&i2c_pdata);
pxa27x_set_i2c_power_info(NULL);
pxa_set_camera_info(&mioa701_pxacamera_platform_data);
+
+ regulator_register_always_on(0, "fixed-5.0V", fixed_5v0_consumers,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_5v0_consumers),
+ 5000000);
}
static void mioa701_machine_exit(void)
--
1.8.4.2
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87r49c6bea.fsf@free.fr>
2013-12-17 9:57 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-12-17 18:31 ` pwm-backlight: 3.13-rc1 regression for old arm machine Robert Jarzmik
2013-12-20 9:47 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131217095658.GD13823@ulmo.nvidia.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).