From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
'Laurent Pinchart' <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
'Dan Carpenter' <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
'Joe Perches' <joe@perches.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] pwm: spear: Remove unnecessary OOM messages
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:22:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310122237.GA26681@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005801cf39db$e1a37240$a4ea56c0$%han@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1924 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:04:36PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:30 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 March 2014 00:17:38 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 5 March 2014 19:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Sure, but I wasn't sure whether all error code paths in kmalloc() resulted
> > > > in an OOM message. For instance, the following code path results in an
> > > > allocation failure but doesn't seem to print an OOM message:
> > > >
> > > > kmalloc
> > > > __kmalloc
> > > > __do_kmalloc
> > > > slab_alloc
> > > > slab_should_failslab
> > > > should_failslab
> > > > should_fail
> > > >
> > > > A bit far-fetched possibly as it requires fault injection. I haven't found
> > > > any other such code path, but my understanding of that code is a bit
> > > > limited.
> > >
> > > In that case should we actually accept patches like this at all? As they
> > > might be ending up removing some useful print messages?
> >
> > Dan has pointed out that I've missed the fail_dump() call in should_fail().
> > One could argue that fail_dump() wouldn't print any message if the fault
> > injection framework has verbosity set to 0, but I suppose we can assume that
> > people using the fault injection framework know what they're doing.
> >
> > All other error paths in kmalloc() seem to result in a message being printed.
> > I might have missed something, but I can trust the developers who know that
> > code much better than I do that kmalloc() is designed to print an error
> > message in all error paths. Any failure to print a message would be a
> > kmalloc() bug that should be fixed, and getting rid of the allocation error
> > messages in drivers would seem like a nice cleanup to me.
>
> Hi Thierry Reding,
>
> There seems to be no objection. :-)
> Would you accept these patches?
> Thank you.
All 9 patches applied, thanks.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 0:59 [PATCH 0/9] pwm: Remove unnecessary OOM messages Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm: ab8500: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm: i.MX: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm: pxa: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm: renesas-tpu: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 2:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-26 2:34 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 22:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-26 1:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm: spear: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 4:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-26 4:57 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 5:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-26 5:19 ` Joe Perches
2014-02-26 6:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-03 1:14 ` Jingoo Han
2014-03-03 9:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-05 11:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-05 11:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-05 16:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-05 16:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-07 8:04 ` Jingoo Han
2014-03-10 12:22 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-04-03 3:24 ` Jingoo Han
2014-05-21 10:34 ` Thierry Reding
2014-02-26 1:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm: tegra: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:12 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] pwm: tiehrpwm: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-26 1:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] pwm: vt8500: " Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140310122237.GA26681@ulmo.nvidia.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).