From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] pwm: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:16:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409071614.GA9886@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409080450.4856681c@ipc1.ka-ro>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1935 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:04:50AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tim Kryger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Lothar Waßmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > No. You cannot emulate polarity inversion in software.
> > > >
> > > Why not?
> > >
> > > duty_ns = period_ns - duty_ns;
> > >
> >
> > Since I made the same mistake, I will pass along the pointer Thierry gave
> > me.
> >
> > In include/linux/pwm.h the second difference for an inverted signal is
> > described.
> >
> > /**
> > * enum pwm_polarity - polarity of a PWM signal
> > * @PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: a high signal for the duration of the duty-
> > * cycle, followed by a low signal for the remainder of the pulse
> > * period
> > * @PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED: a low signal for the duration of the duty-
> > * cycle, followed by a high signal for the remainder of the pulse
> > * period
> > */
> > enum pwm_polarity {
> > PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
> > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
> > };
> >
> > Of course, I suspect not all PWM hardware respects this definition of
> > inverted output.
> >
> > Either way, hacking the duty in software certainly would get the high/low
> > order wrong.
> >
> OK. But for a periodic signal this doesn't make any difference. It's
> just a matter of where you set your reference point.
> Only if you program the PWM to create a single cycle you would see the
> difference. I wonder if this is a real life usecase though.
It doesn't make a difference if all you're concerned about is the signal
power (which happens to be the case for LED and backlight use-cases).
Currently any in-kernel users only care about the signal power, but
there's no guarantee that it will stay that way. Furthermore, PWM
channels are exposed to userspace via sysfs, so code that we don't
actually see may rely on this behaviour.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-19 13:22 pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-19 13:22 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] pwm: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-19 13:22 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] pwm: imx: indentation cleanup Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-19 13:22 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-28 8:48 ` [PATCHv3 0/3] " Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-28 8:48 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] pwm: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Lothar Waßmann
2014-04-02 5:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-04-07 11:36 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-08 5:02 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-04-08 20:37 ` Tim Kryger
2014-04-09 6:04 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-04-09 7:16 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-04-08 20:43 ` Tim Kryger
2014-04-09 6:12 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-04-09 7:22 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-10 5:55 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-03-28 8:48 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] pwm: imx: indentation cleanup Lothar Waßmann
2014-03-28 8:49 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Lothar Waßmann
2014-04-02 5:45 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409071614.GA9886@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).