From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
matt.porter@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [resend rfc v3] pwm: add BCM2835 PWM driver
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:18:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140929141820.GA2273@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542960AE.1040200@thomasmore.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2240 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Bart Tanghe wrote:
> On 2014-09-29 07:33, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:45:57AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 09/26/2014 01:11 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:06:48AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>> Oh dear. It sounds like we need at least some form of clock driver for the
> >>>> platform then. I still don't think there's complete documentation for the
> >>>> HW, even though a lot of register docs were published which presumably cover
> >>>> the clock HW? Equally, given that the VC firmware assumes it owns most of
> >>>> the HW, it seems best to manipulate the clocks through the firmware
> >>>> interface rather than directly touching the HW. Unfortunately, I don't
> >>>> believe there's any ABI guarantee on the firmware interface. Perhaps we can
> >>>> get one?
> >>>
> >>> Urgs... this VC firmware seems to be more of a headache that I thought
> >>> it was. How is this handled in other drivers? Surely PWM isn't the first
> >>> one that needs clocks?
> >>
> >> For the other clocks, I've set up dummy fixed-rate clocks in the DT and/or
> >> "clock driver" code to satisfy references by phandle or clock name
> >> respectively. Since the other drivers don't actually manipulate the clock
> >> rates etc., this is enough for the drivers.
> >
> > Given that this driver only queries the clock frequency adding a fixed-
> > rate clock to the device tree should work as well. Then the calls to
> > clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() can still be added as
> > appropriate so that the driver doesn't need to change if a proper clock
> > driver ever gets added.
> >
> > Or am I missing anything? Perhaps the issue is that the default clock
> > rate for the PWM clock isn't usable? That would still not prevent the
> > driver from being merged.
> >
> > Thierry
> >
> The pwm clock is default unusable. To let the pwm clock run, It's necessary to change some
> clock registers. I've added the clk_prepare_enable and the clk_disable_unprepare functions. So the
> driver is able to work with a proper clock driver in the future.
Okay. Sounds good to me.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 12:54 [resend rfc v3] pwm: add BCM2835 PWM driver Bart Tanghe
2014-08-25 13:19 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-04 10:05 ` Bart Tanghe
2014-09-04 15:06 ` Stephen Warren
2014-09-26 7:11 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 10:06 ` Bart Tanghe
2014-09-26 14:45 ` Stephen Warren
2014-09-29 5:33 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-29 13:37 ` Bart Tanghe
2014-09-29 14:18 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140929141820.GA2273@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matt.porter@linaro.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).