Re: [PATCH] fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:43:41AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Reding
> > <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:06:14AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > >> drivers/pwm/pwm-stmpe.c:99:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> > >>
> > >>  Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> > >>
> > >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >>  pwm-stmpe.c |    1 -
> > >>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Erm... this driver doesn't exist in my tree. What's going on?
> > 
> > What's going on is that the 0day build robot builds everything it
> > finds, including experimental branches.
> > 
> > I dunno why it's mailing you though, probably I already added your
> > CC on the patch... stupid me. A bit much to think of.
> 
> I guess the robot generates this patch and then runs get_maintainers.pl
> on it, so it's doing the right thing. Anyway, I'll know to ignore these
> in the future if drivers aren't in my tree yet.

Sorry I've added some heuristics to avoid adding CC from
get_maintainers.pl for the likely private branches. It should reduce
such confusions and noises considerably in future.

Thanks,
Fengguang