From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:22:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027102218.028384ff@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161027094005.2da3b7d4@bbrezillon>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4122 bytes --]
Hi Boris,
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:29:39 +0200
> Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl> wrote:
>
> > The code has been rewritten to remove "generic" calls to
> > imx_pwm_{enable|disable|config}.
> >
> > Such approach would facilitate switch to atomic PWM (a.k.a
> > ->apply()) implementation.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>
> > ---
> > Changes for v2:
> > - Add missing clock unprepare for clk_ipg
> > - Enable peripheral PWM clock (clk_per)
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 50
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed,
> > 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > index ea3ce79..822eb5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ struct imx_chip {
> > static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> > {
> > - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > -
> > /*
> > * The PWM subsystem allows for exact frequencies. However,
> > * I cannot connect a scope on my device to the PWM line
> > and @@ -84,26 +82,56 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct
> > pwm_chip *chip,
> > * both the prescaler (/1 .. /128) and then by CLKSEL
> > * (/2 .. /16).
> > */
> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > u32 max = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP);
> > u32 p = max * duty_ns / period_ns;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > writel(max - p, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS);
> >
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool
> > enable) +static int imx_pwm_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> > pwm_device *pwm) {
> > struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > + int ret;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
> > + val |= MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
> >
> > - if (enable)
> > - val |= MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > - else
> > - val &= ~MX1_PWMC_EN;
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imx_pwm_disable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> > pwm_device *pwm) +{
> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
> > + val &= ~MX1_PWMC_EN;
> >
> > writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC);
>
> Are you sure you don't need to enable the ipg clk when manipulating
> the PWMC register?
> If it's not needed here, then it's probably not needed in
> imx_pwm_enable_v1() either.
Yes, probably it is needed.
As I've mentioned in the cover letter - I do not have PWMv1 HW so I can
only compile test the code.
(And here support from the community is very welcome).
Best regards,
Łukasz Majewski
>
> > +
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> > }
> >
> > static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > @@ -241,9 +269,9 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip
> > *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) }
> >
> > static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> > - .enable = imx_pwm_enable,
> > - .disable = imx_pwm_disable,
> > - .config = imx_pwm_config,
> > + .enable = imx_pwm_enable_v1,
> > + .disable = imx_pwm_disable_v1,
> > + .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -262,8 +290,6 @@ struct imx_pwm_data {
> > };
> >
> > static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> > - .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> > - .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> > .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v1,
> > };
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 6:29 [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: imx: Provide atomic operation for IMX PWM driver Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pwm: print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug() Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] pwm: imx: Add separate set of pwm ops for PWMv1 and PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 7:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-27 8:22 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2016-10-31 5:59 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-10-31 8:06 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-31 9:24 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-10-31 9:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-10-31 11:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-11-01 5:57 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-11-01 7:17 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-01 8:20 ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-11-01 8:59 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-02 7:18 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-11-02 7:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-02 7:56 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-11-02 8:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-02 8:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-11-02 9:34 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 software reset code to a separate function Lukasz Majewski
2016-11-03 9:34 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 wait for fifo slot " Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] pwm: imx: Remove redundant i.MX PWMv2 code Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Lukasz Majewski
2016-10-27 6:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] pwm: imx: Add polarity inversion support to i.MX's PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161027102218.028384ff@jawa \
--to=l.majewski@majess.pl \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).