linux-pwm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Kamil Debski <kamil@wypas.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:23:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602132353.GA12690@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493039598-25881-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:13:17PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> ---
> Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).

I lost track where we are with this patch. The above series set did not make
it, as far as I can see. Is this patch truly dependent on that series, or
can it be applied separately ? It does apply cleanly.

Thanks,
Guenter

> 
>  drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> index 9dc40f3..4ac7700 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> @@ -40,31 +40,22 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>  
>  static int  __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
>  {
> -	struct pwm_args pargs;
> -	unsigned long duty;
> +	unsigned long period;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
> +	struct pwm_state state = { };
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
>  	if (ctx->pwm_value == pwm)
>  		goto exit_set_pwm_err;
>  
> -	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> -	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto exit_set_pwm_err;
> -
> -	if (pwm == 0)
> -		pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
> +	pwm_init_state(ctx->pwm, &state);
> +	period = ctx->pwm->args.period;
> +	state.duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> +	state.enabled = pwm ? true : false;
>  
> -	if (ctx->pwm_value == 0) {
> -		ret = pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
> -		if (ret)
> -			goto exit_set_pwm_err;
> -	}
> -
> -	ctx->pwm_value = pwm;
> +	ret = pwm_apply_state(ctx->pwm, &state);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ctx->pwm_value = pwm;
>  exit_set_pwm_err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -218,10 +209,9 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>  	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx;
> -	struct pwm_args pargs;
>  	struct device *hwmon;
> -	int duty_cycle;
>  	int ret;
> +	struct pwm_state state = { };
>  
>  	ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!ctx)
> @@ -237,28 +227,16 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
> -	 * atomic PWM API.
> -	 */
> -	pwm_apply_args(ctx->pwm);
> -
> -	/* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed */
> -	pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
> -
> -	duty_cycle = pargs.period - 1;
>  	ctx->pwm_value = MAX_PWM;
>  
> -	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, pargs.period);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	/* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed and enable PWM output */
> +	pwm_init_state(ctx->pwm, &state);
> +	state.duty_cycle = ctx->pwm->args.period - 1;
> +	state.enabled = true;
>  
> -	/* Enbale PWM output */
> -	ret = pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
> +	ret = pwm_apply_state(ctx->pwm, &state);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable PWM\n");
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -266,8 +244,8 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  						       ctx, pwm_fan_groups);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hwmon)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register hwmon device\n");
> -		pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
> -		return PTR_ERR(hwmon);
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(hwmon);
> +		goto err_pwm_disable;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(&pdev->dev, ctx);
> @@ -282,14 +260,20 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
>  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>  				"Failed to register pwm-fan as cooling device");
> -			pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
> -			return PTR_ERR(cdev);
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
> +			goto err_pwm_disable;
>  		}
>  		ctx->cdev = cdev;
>  		thermal_cdev_update(cdev);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_pwm_disable:
> +	state.enabled = false;
> +	pwm_apply_state(ctx->pwm, &state);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int pwm_fan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-02 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20170424131342epcas5p4cb2f53f6c780119557ff3da56fb8f0a8@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170424131346epcas1p4584c5e78edfe5055beaba0ce0f5e5ae7@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2017-04-24 13:13     ` [PATCH] pwm: pwm-samsung: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-08-21  8:29       ` Thierry Reding
2017-04-24 13:26   ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guenter Roeck
2017-04-24 14:25     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-02 13:23   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2017-06-07 13:38     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-07 21:07       ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170602132353.GA12690@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kamil@wypas.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).