From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] pwm-backlight: enable/disable the PWM before/after LCD enable toggle. Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:06:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20180201120643.3spdhgvudjk3eb3b@dell> References: <20171201120651.29633-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f176.google.com ([209.85.128.176]:46968 "EHLO mail-wr0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbeBAMGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 07:06:48 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f176.google.com with SMTP id g21so18668039wrb.13 for ; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 04:06:48 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: Enric Balletbo Serra Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Daniel Thompson , Jingoo Han , Rob Herring , Pavel Machek , Heiko Stuebner , Thierry Reding , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , Linux PWM List , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Guenter Roeck , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra : > > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and > > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on > > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence > > to follow the specs. > > > > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: > > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) > > - N116BGE (Innolux) > > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) > > - B101EAN0 (Auo) > > - B101AW03 (Auo) > > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) > > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) > > > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson > > Acked-by: Jingoo Han > > --- > > Changes since v4: > > - Rebase on top of mainline. > > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han. > > Changes since v3: > > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson) > > Changes since v2: > > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding) > > Changes since v1: > > - None > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset, > there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or > incorporate in linux-next? Looks like Daniel should Ack 2/5 since he had comments on it before and it still lacks a Backlight Ack. With regards to -next, the merge-window is open (should close in a little over a week), so the chances are, you'll get a long soak before the next merge-window opens. -- Lee Jones Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog