From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: lpss: Only set update bit if we are actually changing the settings
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:12:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181014151202.29955-3-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181014151202.29955-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
According to the datasheet the update bit must be set if the on-time-div
or the base-unit changes.
Now that we properly order device resume on Cherry Trail so that the GFX0
_PS0 method no longer exits with an error, we end up with a sequence of
events where we are writing the same values twice in a row.
First the _PS0 method restores the duty cycle of 0% the GPU driver set
on suspend and then the GPU driver first updates just the enabled bit in
the pwm_state from 0 to 1, causing us to write the same values again,
before restoring the pre-suspend duty-cycle in a separate pwm_apply call.
When writing the update bit the second time, without changing any of
the values the update bit clears immediately / instantly, instead of
staying 1 for a while as usual. After this the next setting of the update
bit seems to be ignored, causing the restoring of the pre-suspend
duty-cycle to not get applied. This makes the backlight come up with
a 0% dutycycle after suspend/resume.
Any further brightness changes after this do work.
This commit moves the setting of the update bit into pwm_lpss_prepare()
and only sets the bit if we have actually changed any of the values.
This avoids the setting of the update bit the second time we configure
the PWM to 0% dutycycle, this fixes the backlight coming up with 0%
duty-cycle after a suspend/resume.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index 293e5139b091..f170873e6fb4 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
unsigned long long on_time_div;
unsigned long c = lpwm->info->clk_rate, base_unit_range;
unsigned long long base_unit, freq = NSEC_PER_SEC;
- u32 ctrl;
+ u32 orig_ctrl, ctrl;
do_div(freq, period_ns);
@@ -105,13 +105,17 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
do_div(on_time_div, period_ns);
on_time_div = 255ULL - on_time_div;
- ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
+ orig_ctrl = ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK;
ctrl &= ~(base_unit_range << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
base_unit &= base_unit_range;
ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT;
ctrl |= on_time_div;
- pwm_lpss_write(pwm, ctrl);
+
+ if (orig_ctrl != ctrl) {
+ pwm_lpss_write(pwm, ctrl);
+ pwm_lpss_write(pwm, ctrl | PWM_SW_UPDATE);
+ }
}
static inline void pwm_lpss_cond_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm, bool cond)
@@ -135,7 +139,6 @@ static int pwm_lpss_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return ret;
}
pwm_lpss_prepare(lpwm, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
- pwm_lpss_write(pwm, pwm_lpss_read(pwm) | PWM_SW_UPDATE);
pwm_lpss_cond_enable(pwm, lpwm->info->bypass == false);
ret = pwm_lpss_wait_for_update(pwm);
if (ret) {
@@ -148,7 +151,6 @@ static int pwm_lpss_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (ret)
return ret;
pwm_lpss_prepare(lpwm, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
- pwm_lpss_write(pwm, pwm_lpss_read(pwm) | PWM_SW_UPDATE);
return pwm_lpss_wait_for_update(pwm);
}
} else if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
--
2.19.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-14 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-14 15:12 [PATCH 0/2] pwm: lpss: Force runtime-resume on suspend on CHT devices Hans de Goede
2018-10-14 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] pwm: lpss: Force runtime-resume on suspend on Cherry Trail Hans de Goede
2018-10-14 15:12 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-10-16 11:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] pwm: lpss: Force runtime-resume on suspend on CHT devices Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181014151202.29955-3-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox