Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] Documentation: ARM: sunxi: pwm: add Allwinner sun8i.

[Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1269 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:35:23AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:18:59AM +0800, Hao Zhang wrote:
> > > +  - clocks: From common clock binding, handle to the parent clock.
> > > +  - clock-names: Must contain the clock names described just above.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > You seem to have used mux-0 and mux-1 for the clock names. I guess we
> > don't have to use a name there, we can simply use the position to find
> > out (as long as it's documented in the binding)
> 
> I also wondered if the driver relies on the fact that the second clock
> is the faster running one. Is this sensible?

Not really, I'm not sure we can make those expectations in the DT
binding, especially since clock rate can change at runtime.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]