From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: Offer to co-maintain drivers/pwm [Was: Re: [PATCH] PWM: drop legacy wrapper for changing polarity]
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:53:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916135333.GB18267@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916130547.xflkrm7dwgnec7dx@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:05:47PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:25:47AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I certainly wouldn't mind a little help. Reviewing patches will
> > definitely help move things along.
>
> I'm a bit frustrated with the state of the list of open patches. There
> were little feedback from you on the list since July, during this time
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/list/ grew by ~1.5 pages
> and there are still topics that I want to bring forward that depend on
> you to cooperate. As I spend quite some time reviewing patches here, I
> wonder if you'd be willing to give me maintainer-status for the pwm
> patchwork to update the state on the various patches there. If you want
> I can also add me to the MAINTAINERS file (as reviewer or maintainer --
> whatever you consider sensible). I'd also like to have pwm patches
> applied in a more expeditious way and expose them in next.
Feel free to send a patch to add you as reviewer, you've been doing good
work so far.
I know I've been lagging behind on review and maintainance tasks since I
have been busy with a bunch of other things lately and I've had little
to no spare time at all for a few weeks. I'm hopeful that things will
get back to mostly normal for the next cycle (things have been slowing
down recently). I'm also considering making a few changes to my daily
routine so that I can hopefully get around to patch review sooner.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-15 8:21 [PATCH] PWM: drop legacy wrapper for changing polarity Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-04 21:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-20 16:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-30 8:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-06 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-11 21:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-12 10:25 ` Thierry Reding
2018-12-12 10:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-09-16 13:05 ` Offer to co-maintain drivers/pwm [Was: Re: [PATCH] PWM: drop legacy wrapper for changing polarity] Uwe Kleine-König
2019-09-16 13:53 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2018-12-12 10:56 ` [PATCH] PWM: drop legacy wrapper for changing polarity Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916135333.GB18267@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox