From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Add Maxim MAX7313 PWM support Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20191105154419.11e7f625@xps13> References: <20191014124803.13661-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20191015163055.0d8f44e5@xps13> <20191104161103.64995b8a@xps13> <20191104203346.epdbzflnynh2gf3z@pengutronix.de> <20191105100157.2b6eb22b@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , Thierry Reding , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Petazzoni , Sascha Hauer List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, Andy Shevchenko wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:08:39 +0200: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:02 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019 > > 09:06:37 +0200: > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:33 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > > wrote: > > > > For me it sounds more likely that PWM is a *pin function* of a pin > > > controller and actually this GPIO driver should be a pin controller > > > with corresponding function(s). > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the input, I will address Thierry's comments and > > re-submit as a single file (same shape as in v1). > > Perhaps I have to be more clear. What I meant is that pin control > should support PWM pin function and PCA953x be converted to a pin > control + GPIO + PWM. > Above definitely is not what you did and it's not for immediate submission. Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was answering Uwe. > I really would like to hear if it makes sense. While this would probably be the nicest and cleanest solution, I don't think it is doable in a reasonable amount of time compared to the benefits. Thanks, Miquèl