From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:55:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116005503.GA8559@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114074710.kxkz4664oap3r752@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:47:10AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I didn't thought about that much, but it would be great if we could
> prepare the affected drivers to work with both, int and u64 and switch
> in a separate commit. Reverting would then become cheaper.
> The conversion to 64-bit division macros could be done even without
> actually converting period and duty cycle, couldn't it?
I do agree that with such a two-step process the reverting (should the
need arise) would be much cheaper. I tried out your suggestion and saw
that this is not possible as the patch stands currently due to
compilation warning and errors that arise for various architectures:
warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
note: expected 'uint64_t *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'unsigned int *'
warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
Could you please indicate how we should proceed further?
> This Reported-by: looks wrong. It gave some hints about what had to be
> improved in an earlier revision of this patch, but usually this means
> that the patch is a fix for an earlier commit. So I would put this in
> the text, something like:
>
> The kbuild test robot helped to improve this patch series to
> (hopefully) catch all code sites having to be adapted.
Noted, will make this change.
> In ir-rx51.c you used DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL to replace
> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST, here it is DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST. Maybe it is worth
> to describe the relevant difference shortly in the commit log.
Sure, will make a note of this in the commit log. In short, one is used
when only the numerator is 64-bit while the other is meant for the case
when both numerator and denominator are 64-bit.
Thank you.
Guru Das.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-13 23:53 [PATCH v4 0/1] Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-01-13 23:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] pwm: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-01-14 7:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-01-16 0:55 ` Guru Das Srinagesh [this message]
2020-01-16 8:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116005503.GA8559@codeaurora.org \
--to=gurus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).