From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 22:07:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20200220210718.4vrn6u2c2remeuhm@pengutronix.de> References: <20200203213536.32226-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <08e2b640f0a7713d905295fc4f75df49617be6c1.camel@suse.de> <3b22decc-9ebd-3522-4fd7-e5721c8b25b2@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3b22decc-9ebd-3522-4fd7-e5721c8b25b2@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Florian Fainelli , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:PWM SUBSYSTEM" , Scott Branden , Stephen Warren , Ray Jui , "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..." , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org [Dropping Bart Tanghe from recipents as the address bounces] Hello Thierry, On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:14:00AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 2/4/20 1:17 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:35 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> The newer 2711 and 7211 chips have two PWM controllers and failure to > >> dynamically allocate the PWM base would prevent the second PWM > >> controller instance being probed for succeeding with an -EEXIST error > >> from alloc_pwms(). > >> > >> Fixes: e5a06dc5ac1f ("pwm: Add BCM2835 PWM driver") > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > >> --- > > > > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > Thierry, is there any chance we can get this applied for an upcoming > 5.6-rcX? Thank you! to assist you with patch sorting: # revisions < v6 of "Convert period and duty cycle to u64" pwclient -s Superseded 1237020 1237019 1229049 1229050 1222396 # most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v5 isn't for pwm pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1238908 1238907 1238906 1238904 1238903 1238901 # most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v4 isn't for pwm pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1224598 1224597 1224596 1224594 1224593 1224592 pwclient -s "Superseeded" 1224595 # "backlight: pwm_bl: Use gpiod_get_value_cansleep() to get initial # state" already applied by Lee Jones pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1031586 # Problem resolved by Michal Vokáč pwclient -s "Rejected" 1059267 (Not sure "Rejected" is the right state.) Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |