From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mfd: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20200324081651.GG5477@dell> References: <1581895931-6056-1-git-send-email-jeff@labundy.com> <1581895931-6056-3-git-send-email-jeff@labundy.com> <20200224111448.GS3494@dell> <20200228034220.GA3510@labundy.com> <20200302120458.GY3494@dell> <20200302141117.GA11787@labundy.com> <20200302142405.GA3494@dell> <20200323021605.GA2731@labundy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200323021605.GA2731-Sk+WRT7NHmFBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff LaBundy Cc: dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org, lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org, pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org, linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:24:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Mar 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:04:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well done Jeff. Good job. > > > > > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your kind words as well as your support in fleshing out this > > > > > series. > > > > > > > > > > Just to confirm, does your offer to take the remainder (once everything is > > > > > approved) through immutable branches still stand? > > > > > > > > Depends how quickly you can get the other drivers turned around. > > > > > > With Uwe's approval from Friday, all five drivers are complete. Dmitry and > > > Jonathan's approvals were given in previous review cycles and were carried > > > forward with their permission. If anything else is required, please let me > > > know. > > > > Does Uwe's review mean that Thierry's is not required? > > Sorry about that; I was jumping the gun (thank you Uwe for clarifying). > The pwm patch still needs an Ack from Thierry before it can be applied. > > I have not received any feedback from Thierry throughout this patch set, > and I'd like to unblock the remainder if possible. In case Thierry does > not respond by the time you elect to send your next pull request, would > you be willing to drop the pwm patch and take the input and iio patches > through your tree? > > If so, I'll re-send the pwm patch on its own to Thierry during a future > cycle so that he can take it through his tree at his convenience. Hopefully we hear fro Thierry. If not, yes I can apply the set without the PWM patch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog