linux-pwm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
	"David Collins" <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 08/11] pwm: sun4i: Use nsecs_to_jiffies to avoid a division
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:20:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410192041.GC21571@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436e1a50e603eefb24c8e7b2bd7f7e4838b90e12.1586414867.git.gurus@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:52:37PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
> to u64, prepare for this transition by using nsecs_to_jiffies() which
> does away with the need for a division operation.
> 
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 5c677c5..1694e69 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  	val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
>  	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
>  	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
> -		usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
> +		nsecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period + 1000);
>  
>  	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
>  		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
> -- 

Hi Chen-Yu,

You had provided your "Acked-by:" [1] for an earlier version of this
patch but now that I've revised the patch based on a review comment I
received [2], could you please review this patch once again?

Thank you.

Guru Das.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11755.html
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11956.html

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-10 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09  6:52 [PATCH v12 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] ir-rx51: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] pwm: clps711x: Cast period to u32 before use as divisor Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] pwm: pwm-imx-tpm: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro and function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-10 19:16   ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] pwm: sifive: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] pwm: sun4i: Use nsecs_to_jiffies to avoid a division Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-10 19:20   ` Guru Das Srinagesh [this message]
2020-04-11  5:49   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-16  9:44   ` Lee Jones
2020-04-16 17:55     ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] clk: pwm: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-10 19:15   ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200410192041.GC21571@codeaurora.org \
    --to=gurus@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).