Linux PWM subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>,
	<robh@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] iio: adc: ad4851: add ad485x driver
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:43:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117154309.000003e1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4ur7trhknm7jtjvsyms4aewypl75uuvgtccgwc7dfycheh4qo@jqmpv5t3lip6>

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:59:04 +0100
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 02:01:34PM +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> > +static const int ad4851_oversampling_ratios[] = {
> > +	1, 2, 4, 8, 16,	32, 64, 128,
> > +	256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768,
> > +	65536,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int ad4851_osr_to_regval(unsigned int ratio)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ad4851_oversampling_ratios); i++)
> > +		if (ratio == ad4851_oversampling_ratios[i])
> > +			return i - 1;
> > +
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}  
> 
> This can be simplified (I guess) using something like:
> 
> 	if (ratio >= 2 && ratio <= 65536 && is_power_of_2(ratio))
> 		return ilog2(ratio) - 1;
> 
> 	return -EINVAL;
Hi Uwe,

Only at the cost of providing custom handling to compute the above
array in order to provide it to userspace via the read_avail() callback.

We could do what you have here and provide the array but that would
be less clear than just looking it up.

> 
> > +static void __ad4851_get_scale(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int scale_tbl,
> > +			       unsigned int *val, unsigned int *val2)
> > +{
> > [...]
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ad4851_scale_fill(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > [...]
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ad4851_set_oversampling_ratio(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +					 const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> > +					 unsigned int osr)
> > +{
> > [...]
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ad4851_get_oversampling_ratio(struct ad4851_state *st, unsigned int *val)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int osr;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(st->regmap, AD4851_REG_OVERSAMPLE, &osr);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!FIELD_GET(AD4851_OS_EN_MSK, osr))
> > +		*val = 1;
> > +	else
> > +		*val = ad4851_oversampling_ratios[FIELD_GET(AD4851_OS_RATIO_MSK, osr) + 1];  
> 
> With the suggestion above this gets:
> 
> 	*val = 2 << FIELD_GET(AD4851_OS_RATIO_MSK, osr);
> 
> (or 
> 	*val = 1 << (FIELD_GET(AD4851_OS_RATIO_MSK, osr) + 1);
> 
> ). Then you can drop ad4851_oversampling_ratios[].
You missed the usage in as4851_read_avail() which is the reason it exists.
These others are just convenient given that it already exists.

Jonathan


> 
> > +
> > +	st->osr = *val;
> > +
> > +	return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +}  
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-17 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-20 12:01 [PATCH v9 1/8] iio: backend: add API for interface get Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] iio: backend: add support for data size set Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] iio: backend: add API for oversampling Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: add interface type Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: set data format Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: add oversampling Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad4851 Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-23 11:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-08 16:48     ` David Lechner
2024-12-20 12:01 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] iio: adc: ad4851: add ad485x driver Antoniu Miclaus
2024-12-23 12:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-08 17:06     ` David Lechner
2025-01-08 23:24   ` David Lechner
2025-01-14 12:01     ` Miclaus, Antoniu
2025-01-14 13:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-14 15:51         ` David Lechner
2025-01-17  9:59   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-01-17 15:43     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-12-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] iio: backend: add API for interface get Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250117154309.000003e1@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox